Re: Watch Dogs

by M99 on Thu Mar 06, 2014 6:46 pm

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/03/06/how-watch-dogs-wisely-separates-itself-from-gta-5

Looks great :bow:

by Twoism on Fri Mar 07, 2014 1:56 am

@M99 wrote:

May 27th release date confirmed.

The graphic looks terrible compared to gameplay footage from last year. I hope it's just a rush trailer job and not an indication to actual graphic in game.

by M99 on Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:12 am

@Twoism wrote:
@M99 wrote:

May 27th release date confirmed.

The graphic looks terrible compared to gameplay footage from last year. I hope it's just a rush trailer job and not an indication to actual graphic in game.

Maybe this graphics is from current gen and the footage showed last year was the next gen versions hmm

by Firenze on Fri Mar 07, 2014 4:28 pm

game looks like complete shite graphically and it was delayed because they felt parts were too repetitive.

fully expecting it to be mediocre, Assassins Creed 1 style. Dat Ubisoft.

by RealGunner on Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:40 pm

@Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:Tbh i don't think its going to get anywhere close to GTA.

So yeah i will still keep fapping to GTA, said from the beginning that while Watchdogs looks good its going to be killed by its hype i don't think its anywhere near as good as people think it is.

I see a 8/10 max, i have seen this before game gets hyped beyond the stratosphere which a little different from the norm for 2 straight years before people get to play it.

It will disappoint of that i am sure, a bad game no but it won't be anywhere near as good as people think its going to be.

This is why he is a leader Molenation

by M99 on Fri Mar 07, 2014 7:44 pm

I liked what I read from IGN's hands on. Wait till the game is released GL-ve lol.

by VendettaRed07 on Fri Mar 07, 2014 7:49 pm

Downgrade of the CENTURY

Watch Dogs - Page 2 2450164-6415833087-watch

by VendettaRed07 on Fri Mar 07, 2014 7:52 pm

Ubisoft up to their usual lies and BS when it comes to next gen deception. This is almost as bad as red steel.. lf anyone remembers that hahah.

by Great Leader Sprucenuce on Fri Mar 07, 2014 9:52 pm

Tbf this is hardly surprising lol.

Happens with every new game at E3.... dev wows everyone by showing game on high end souped up pc dev kit.

Then people are suddenly shocked when the game doesn't live up to the standards of a 2 grand super PC lol.

No surprise it doesn't live up to those standards, especially when its cross gen as well.

by VendettaRed07 on Fri Mar 07, 2014 10:13 pm

Yeah, l expected some comprimises to be made.. But look at other games like lnfamous, or MGSV, or other great looking next gen games. l didn't think it was unrealistic to expect something at the very least, really close to that.

But this.. lol.. lts not even the same game. lt went from the best looking, next gen game, to a glorified PS2 game. l can't remember a game getting downgraded so much.

Those lighting effects rofl

Re4 on the GC did better

by Great Leader Sprucenuce on Fri Mar 07, 2014 10:18 pm

Infamous is just new gen though.

I'd stick my neck out and say if this was just PC, PS4 and XBO then it would look a lot better.

Shocker that old generation is holding games back.... hope Arkham Knight comes the norm very soon. People have been holding onto PS3 etc etc for too long its time to let go.

by Blue Barrett on Fri Mar 07, 2014 10:53 pm

The eggs on your faces when the game turns out to be GOAT rofl

by Blue Barrett on Fri Mar 07, 2014 10:56 pm

@Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:Infamous is just new gen though.

I'd stick my neck out and say if this was just PC, PS4 and XBO then it would look a lot better.

Shocker that old generation is holding games back.... hope Arkham Knight comes the norm very soon. People have been holding onto PS3 etc etc for too long its time to let go.

Brah the next gen games only came out last November Laughing

what are you on about?

You know how long PS1 games were still in production before attention was fully placed on PS2? Or PS2 to PS3? Relax ffs. It hasn't even been 6 months rofl

by VendettaRed07 on Fri Mar 07, 2014 11:02 pm

I think the difference is that those generations where like only 3-4 or 5 years.

the PS3 came out 8 years ago. 360 almost 9. Maybe its not gamers that have to let the systems go yet but certainly developers have to make the leap. Its been so long. Last generation got so ridiculously stale towards the end. Lets move forward pls.

by Twoism on Fri Mar 07, 2014 11:56 pm

It takes time to learn the new hardware I think hence devs still learning it. But then again, Tomb Raider Definitive Edition managed to look amazing compared to last gen just by max everything up. GZ and Second Son also look like proper next gen games.

Don't care much for Watch Dog, I just hope Ubi doesn't pull this bs with The Division & From Software takes as much time as they want to do proper DS2 PS4 port.

by Great Leader Sprucenuce on Sat Mar 08, 2014 12:35 am

@VendettaRed07 wrote:I think the difference is that those generations where like only 3-4 or 5 years.

the PS3 came out 8 years ago. 360 almost 9. Maybe its not gamers that have to let the systems go yet but certainly developers have to make the leap. Its been so long. Last generation got so ridiculously stale towards the end. Lets move forward pls.

Basically yeah.

by M99 on Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:07 pm

by FalcaoPunch on Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:33 pm

Not at all excited by this game anymore. I will wait till it drops in price or I hear that it's a good game.
Delay followed by a downgrade in graphics doesn't seem promising.

by Blue Barrett on Fri Mar 28, 2014 10:06 pm

The graphics don't look as outstanding. Still getting it thought. Its taken long enough ffs.

by FalcaoPunch on Fri Mar 28, 2014 10:21 pm

@Blue Barrett wrote:The graphics don't look as outstanding. Still getting it thought. Its taken long enough ffs.

I might end up getting it as well. If the graphics are okay that's not a bad thing as long as the gameplay/story make up for it. As long as a game is fun, I'm down for it.