Re: Manchester United Part V/Ole Sack Watch

by Helmer Sun Aug 30, 2015 6:33 pm

Utd and Liverpool both suck...it will come down who does it eefficiently to drop out of top 4 Laughing

by RealGunner Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:00 pm

by DeletedUser#1 Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:02 pm

^ Chelsea just below City ? REALLY ?

They are utter turd. A finished captain, an even more finished Vice captain, a found out crock, and a Finished at the top level midfielder, as well as a manager known to get bored and be found out at his 3rd season at clubs.

Chelsea are closer to Palace than to City.

It's just a shame that we and Utd have shocking shocking managers, and Arsenal are just Arsenal.

by Doc Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:09 pm

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-united/transfers/verein/985

Utd spent around 62 million pounds and sold around the same figure. Not actually hard to find out really.

by iftikhar Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:10 pm

RealGunner wrote:We are right there with you guys.

City
|
|
|
Chelsea/Palace
|
|
Arsenal
\/
Liverpool/United/Swansea/Leicester/Tottenham/Everton
|
|
|
|
|
\/
rest

agreed

by B-Mac Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:22 pm

futbol wrote:Depay looks pretty average. Scored a great goal against Brugge but that aside he's selfish and fails to dribble past his marker most of the times. Looks a Young level talent. What do United fans think so far?

are you just going to writing this? and hope it becomes truth after a handful of games for a young player in a new league

by futbol Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:23 pm

B-Mac wrote:
futbol wrote:Depay looks pretty average. Scored a great goal against Brugge but that aside he's selfish and fails to dribble past his marker most of the times. Looks a Young level talent. What do United fans think so far?

are you just going to writing this? and hope it becomes truth after a handful of games for a young player in a new league

Yes.

by Unique Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:28 pm

Doc wrote:http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-united/transfers/verein/985

Utd spent around 62 million pounds and sold around the same figure. Not actually hard to find out really.

no they didn't. They spent more than that.

by Myesyats Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:35 pm

Manchester United Part V/Ole Sack Watch - Page 7 CNrNFLPWcAEvxCJ

hahahaaha

by Doc Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:35 pm

Wanna show where Utd spent more this season dear? You know, the 2015/2016 season...

by DeletedUser#1 Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:38 pm

Doc wrote:Wanna show where Utd spent more this season dear? You know, the 2015/2016 season...

I'm certainly Schweini cost close to 15M, and not 6M.

Depay was also 30M euros which is more than 19M pounds.

Not that any of it matters....

by B-Mac Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:39 pm

£24.50m(Schneiderlin)+£19.25m(Memphis)+£12.60m(Darmian)+£6.30m(Schweinsteiger)=£62.65

math.

by Unique Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:40 pm

Natalie Portman wrote:
Doc wrote:Wanna show where Utd spent more this season dear? You know, the 2015/2016 season...

I'm certainly Schweini cost close to 15M, and not 6M.

Depay was also 30M euros which is more than 19M pounds.

Not that any of it matters....

they defo spent more on players than they got back for Evans and Di Maria.

by Unique Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:41 pm

B-Mac wrote:£24.50m(Schneiderlin)+£19.25m(Memphis)+£12.60m(Darmian)+£6.30m(Schweinsteiger)=£62.65

math.

you didn't get swine for 6mil.lol

by B-Mac Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:43 pm

Natalie Portman wrote:
Doc wrote:Wanna show where Utd spent more this season dear? You know, the 2015/2016 season...

I'm certainly Schweini cost close to 15M, and not 6M.

Depay was also 30M euros which is more than 19M pounds.

Not that any of it matters....

except everyone has confirmed that Bastian only cost us 6 million

and depending on the day 30M euros is right around 20M pounds

by B-Mac Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:43 pm

Unique wrote:
B-Mac wrote:£24.50m(Schneiderlin)+£19.25m(Memphis)+£12.60m(Darmian)+£6.30m(Schweinsteiger)=£62.65

math.

you didn't get swine for 6mil.lol

oh ya you know more then what multiple sources reported?

by B-Mac Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:44 pm

Unique wrote:
Natalie Portman wrote:
Doc wrote:Wanna show where Utd spent more this season dear? You know, the 2015/2016 season...

I'm certainly Schweini cost close to 15M, and not 6M.

Depay was also 30M euros which is more than 19M pounds.

Not that any of it matters....
they defo spent more on players than they got back for Evans and Di Maria.

Evans Di Maria Van Persie Nani Rafael Henriquez all sold for fee's

by RED Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:45 pm

linetty wrote:

hahahaaha

A look of sheer frustrations at the misgivings of his squad.

Everyone knew what our deficiencies were, yet he and the board flaffed about trying to get unobtainable players, waste time on our GK situation.

yada yada...I could go on and on.

:facepalm:

welcome to reality Louis you stubborn so and so.

by Unique Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:51 pm

RED wrote:
linetty wrote:

hahahaaha

A look of sheer frustrations at the misgivings of his squad.

Everyone knew what our deficiencies were, yet he and the board flaffed about trying to get unobtainable players, waste time on our GK situation.

yada yada...I could go on and on.

welcome to reality Louis you stubborn so and so.

what man u try to do in the transfer window amounts to me saying I'm gonna save up and buy a bugatti varon. Sounds good. But it's not going to happen Laughing

by Kaladin Mon Aug 31, 2015 6:47 pm

---Navas
Darmian-----Smalling-----Rojo/Blind------Shaw
---Herrera----Schneiderlin----Schweini
--------Martial?------------Rooney---------------------Depay

by urbaNRoots Mon Aug 31, 2015 6:50 pm

That is a truly average team. Unbelievable job, Louis.

by Mr Nick09 Mon Aug 31, 2015 6:56 pm

it's a very good team. THey lack "stars" but they have very very good player in their squad. enough to compete for top 4

by EL Patron Mon Aug 31, 2015 6:58 pm

I love it when Van Gal realises that his slow ass predictable boring lifeless possession game isn't working and he decides to bring on Fellaini, Yanited go from classic Ajax to prime stoke in an instant. Philosophy :whistle:

by McAgger Mon Aug 31, 2015 7:01 pm

Mr Nick09 wrote:it's a very good team. THey lack "stars" but they have very very good player in their squad. enough to compete for top 4

pls stop

Van Gaal making it easy for David Brent to get top 4. No Klopp for Liverpool ffs.

But behold, Brentie specializes in failure Proud

We still ain't getting top 4.

by VendettaRed07 Mon Aug 31, 2015 7:04 pm

The CB situation is really suspect, but honestly I don't think they fall out of the top four. They are good enough to get to the CL again.

by Unique Mon Aug 31, 2015 7:30 pm

Don't call me James wrote:
Mr Nick09 wrote:it's a very good team. THey lack "stars" but they have very very good player in their squad. enough to compete for top 4

pls stop

Van Gaal making it easy for David Brent to get top 4. No Klopp for Liverpool ffs.

But behold, Brentie specializes in failure We still ain't getting top 4.

do you think brenda will be gone if we dont get top 4.

by Sponsored content