Is it all about result?

guest_07 wrote:

but that doesn't mean to copy the style of inter 2010 into other team will guarantee you a success

result not matter in what field, is belong to the God

you can't achieve it 100% as what you wanted unless God allow it

the only way we as human have to do is do as best as you can, that is include playing well in football (either use positive football or negative one)

It was a question in hindsight so our answers also have to be in hindsight too, doesn't mean that its necessarily going to happen that way.. And even if it where to be what will guarantee results in reality, then hell, bring on the maureen formular.... In hindsight of course

[b]titosantill
[/b]
I get your point. Off course, a good football required a players that have talent. What I mean is not necesarily all superstar. As long as you have some talent in mix and blend them with great collective setup and work as a team, you can achieve playing good football. There is several club that have alot of talent but don't maximize their potential. Playing good football consistently also can boost your confidence and performances, and the result will come. For me, achieving playing good football has something to do with how creative you are as a team.

Doesn't mean you have to play like Pep's Barca, Just abit more unpredictable either it's counter attack, or posession base football. Liverpool's 2013/2014 is an example. they are just awsome going forward and not static. compare to Milan that back then had alot of talent, but were just too static despite there were alot of talent (had something to do with age)

Bankz wrote:

guest_07 wrote:

but that doesn't mean to copy the style of inter 2010 into other team will guarantee you a success

result not matter in what field, is belong to the God

you can't achieve it 100% as what you wanted unless God allow it

the only way we as human have to do is do as best as you can, that is include playing well in football (either use positive football or negative one)

It was a question in hindsight so our answers also have to be in hindsight too, doesn't mean that its necessarily going to happen that way.. And even if it where to be what will guarantee results in reality, then hell, bring on the maureen formular.... In hindsight of course

Tbh I don't think Mourinho's Inter played ugly/negative football.

It's something that everyone has stuck into their mind for the return leg semi vs Barcelona where they had to play 10 men for 80 minutes at Camp Nou where if they played any different they get smashed 95% of the times.
They played really well and better then the opponents when they knocked us out winning both legs, vs Barca first leg and vs Bayern in the final, and they had a lot of really crazy and entertaining games in Serie A.

@katyperry, exactly. people assume that inter played the way they did against barcelona against everyone else. now if people wanted them to go on an all out offense against messi, ibra, xavi et al with the squad they had (good squad, but nowhere close technically), that's being naive and foolish. mourinho can't and shouldn't be criticized for that. you can criticize him for being a little conservative when you have a strong madrid side playing real betis /levante/ mallorca away from home, and i'll understand that.