Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

by juventus101 Sun 23 Sep - 22:44:21

Which pair do you think are better? If you think its still too early to judge Oscar, then use Mata in his place.

by Onyx Sun 23 Sep - 22:45:38

Mata and Hazard > Cazorla and Podolski.

by Valkyrja Sun 23 Sep - 22:57:30

Hazard and Oscar.

by Highburied Mon 24 Sep - 9:19:08

Hazard and Oscar have huge potential but atm Cazorla s** all over them.

by urbaNRoots Mon 24 Sep - 10:58:40

That duo will destroy us next week.

by VanDeezNuts Mon 24 Sep - 17:08:40

mata hazard definitely better than cazorla podolski

but cazorla is the best of the 4

but if its oscar hazard v cazorla podolski then i have to go with the arsenal duo

by DuringTheWar Mon 24 Sep - 18:15:17

if its cazorla and wilshere instead of podolski, which makes sense seeing how podolski is a different type of player to the others, then hasta la vista chelsea

by Ganso Mon 24 Sep - 19:11:45

too early to judge,most people barely watched oscar and hazard.It will be really interesting to see this weekend's game,2 really strong midfields

by aleumdance Tue 25 Sep - 11:31:45

urbaNRoots wrote:That duo will destroy us next week.

mate, Chelsea would park

urbaNRoots wrote:That duo will destroy us next week.

the bUS, just like they did last season..

no offense to any chelsea fan but RDM can be tootless when the talk is tactics, Stoke did not even Bother parking the Bus against them, it was that bad, what let stoke down is proper finishing

by VivaStPauli Tue 25 Sep - 11:52:51

Hazard/Oscar are probably what most would call "better", but I'm pretty sure Poldi and Cazorla will score more, and work more defensively, at the same time.

by Le Samourai Tue 25 Sep - 13:45:33

Cazorla best player - Podolski a functional complimentary piece.

Hazard and Oscar still have to prove themselves and what not.

by The Messiah Tue 25 Sep - 16:10:24

There is no one single competition here, it's clearly Podolski and Cazorla. Podolski is obviously the best among the 5(including Mata)

by Guest Tue 25 Sep - 17:46:31

Oscar and Hazard are too similar in my opinion, they'd be more appreciated if they are the focal points of two different teams. A striker midfielder partnership is always deadlier when compared to two attacking midfielders.
So Poldizorla.

by Ganso Tue 25 Sep - 18:03:04

hazard and oscar arent similar imo.Oscar is a legit #10 while Hazard is much more explosive and plays better when wide

by Guest Tue 25 Sep - 18:09:29

Hazard cannot be categorized as a traditional winger, he'd still be recognized as someone who provides the link between midfield and attack.Though Oscar can play cm,As you mentioned, he is a traditional 10, someone who provides the link between midfield and attack. So my opinion stands unchanged Smile

by Kick Tue 25 Sep - 23:36:09

Hazard is poor through the centre. Oscar cannot play wide. They are completely different players.

And any attacking midfielders job is to provide a link between midfield and attack. It does make them somewhat similar but you could say the same about Zidane and Ronaldinho in that respect, despite the fact they are completely different players.

by Guest Wed 26 Sep - 4:03:48

That is exactly what I was trying to say, I think Hazard and Oscar won't work out for the same reason that Ronaldinho and Kaka didn't work at Milan.

by Kick Wed 26 Sep - 4:45:34

you're saying you can't have more than one link in each team? :facepalm:

by Guest Wed 26 Sep - 9:33:08

There is a difference between 'not having' and 'not working'

by LeBéninois Fri 28 Sep - 5:31:27

Chelsea duo lacks experience . that the main différence. equally talented or almost but for santi-podi is just the best duo atm

by rwo power Fri 28 Sep - 8:23:45

St.Poldi!

by Lunatic Fringe Wed 27 Mar - 8:39:04

arsenal were outplayed by chelsea on both occasions this season and hazard and oscar were excellent in both, i'm biased so i won't say but i wouldn't be surprised if most people voted for oscar and hazard.

by Sponsored content

Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla