arshavin and Chamakh?

by Raptorgunner Thu 22 Nov - 17:29:02

Why Wenger does not give him playing time? every game he has played this year he has done well and still he does not get minutes.

Who would you like to get subbed in Ramsey or Arshavin? I have seen what Ramsey can do and I hope Wenger starts giving Arshavin more game time. I am not picking on Ramsey but I dont think this is fair.

1.Wlacott 2. Arshavin 3. Ramsey.

1.Giroud 2.Chamakh 3. Gervinho.

by djoe26 Thu 22 Nov - 17:32:09

It is Wenger we are talking about. He plays Gervinho as a CF but refuses to play Walcott who has been asking for that role for years.

by Lex Thu 22 Nov - 17:34:23

Every time Arshavin's played a game, he's been directly responsible for at least one goal, so why not give him a go?

by urbaNRoots Thu 22 Nov - 17:47:06

Arshavin and Chamakh will be gone in the summer while Ramsey will be here for a long time. Wenger might thinks that playing Ramsey is more reasonable than playing Arshavin and Chamakh who won't be here next season.

by Raptorgunner Thu 22 Nov - 17:48:06

After the Reading game I would have given Chamakh more game time, Wenger made a mistake by keeping him out.

by Raptorgunner Thu 22 Nov - 17:58:11

urbaNRoots wrote:Arshavin and Chamakh will be gone in the summer while Ramsey will be here for a long time. Wenger might thinks that playing Ramsey is more reasonable than playing Arshavin and Chamakh who won't be here next season.

No player should be guaranteed a spot at Arsenal if they are not good enouph.

I would send Ramsey on loan and cash for fellaini. I am done sticking by players, we will never get loyalty in return.

I think some players under Wenger get Lazy, and Ramsey is one of them.

by free_cat Thu 22 Nov - 18:09:00

Arshavin is still a good player. Yes, his workrate is shit, but attacking wise he's better than all your other wingers still IMO.

by urbaNRoots Thu 22 Nov - 18:34:05

Raptorgunner wrote:

No player should be guaranteed a spot at Arsenal if they are not good enouph.

I would send Ramsey on loan and cash for fellaini. I am done sticking by players, we will never get loyalty in return.

I think some players under Wenger get Lazy, and Ramsey is one of them.

I would send Ramsey on loan aswell and give Eisfeld a chance. Ramsey is never lazy, you can't say that for him. If there's one thing I admire about him is that he tries and doesn't hide like a coward, he makes shit happen but he tries again and again. He needs a loan spell or some games with the U21.

by SamuelJayC Thu 22 Nov - 22:42:49

This is 100% the last year of Arshavin and Chamakh at Arsenal anyway. Could be the last 2 months if they go in January.

We should get rid of both in early Jan and sign 2 new offensive players, drives me mad we still stick with deadwood.

by Sushi Master Thu 22 Nov - 23:29:27

Why play Chamakh when you can play Podolski in a central position?

Arshavin I would definitely play more because even if he's lazy as frack, he's still a big danger when attacking.

The fullbacks are doing fine, so his lack of workrate won't be noticed as much as in that freak season when all fullbacks were injured.

It's sad, Sheva could have been such a player but he was never really utilized in his natural position down the center.

by SamuelJayC Thu 22 Nov - 23:33:01

Arshavin's contract expires this summer anyway. http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/andrey-arshavin/profil/spieler_15378.html

Chamakh contract lasts until 2014 though.. Crying or Very sad

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/marouane-chamakh/profil/spieler_19085.html

by silver Fri 23 Nov - 8:11:59

Arshavin is our best player on the left after Podolski. He's better than Gervinho and AOC on the LW. He's two footed, always dangerous in attack and can cross with his left. If we want to keep playing to Giroud's strength, we need to play Arshavin more. I still think hes got a lot to offer.

by Raptorgunner Fri 23 Nov - 15:33:25

silver wrote:Arshavin is our best player on the left after Podolski. He's better than Gervinho and AOC on the LW. He's two footed, always dangerous in attack and can cross with his left. If we want to keep playing to Giroud's strength, we need to play Arshavin more. I still think hes got a lot to offer.

Also Arshavin is always healthy and ready to play but some how he is left behind those who dont really deserve the minutes they are getting.

by free_cat Fri 23 Nov - 15:57:19

As LW arshavin is even better than Podolski, I think you would agree. He can take players, cross, shoot or pass, something podolski can't.

by Sina Fri 23 Nov - 16:01:27

Arshavin player i got the most excited for his transfer to go through
i would start him in some games as we play every 3-4 days

Chamakh should leave for his own good

by Raptorgunner Fri 23 Nov - 16:12:55

free_cat wrote:As LW arshavin is even better than Podolski, I think you would agree. He can take players, cross, shoot or pass, something podolski can't.

Arshavin is still a class player, if only Wenger play him in the right position. I think he will be sold in few weeks time.

by Chippy Sat 24 Nov - 1:59:55

Hopefully we will get rid of these two in January along with Squillaci, Bendtner et all.
If we get rid of these players I do believe Wenger will spend.

by TalkingReckless Sat 24 Nov - 2:25:36

Chippy wrote:Hopefully we will get rid of these two in January along with Squillaci, Bendtner et all.
If we get rid of these players I do believe Wenger will spend.

Arshavin and Chamakh might leave, Squillaci won't leave until end of the year when his contract ends. And no one wants Bendtner

by Chippy Sat 24 Nov - 3:00:55

We can only hope.

Surprised about no one coming in for bendtner to be honest as he has a good record for Denmark and had a good Euro's.

by TalkingReckless Sat 24 Nov - 3:13:36

Chippy wrote:We can only hope.

Surprised about no one coming in for bendtner to be honest as he has a good record for Denmark and had a good Euro's.

There are alot of Clubs that want him, but he wants to keep his wage and wants CL...which he never gonna get, rotting at Juv atm

by Chippy Sat 24 Nov - 3:21:45

Legend wrote:
Chippy wrote:We can only hope.

Surprised about no one coming in for bendtner to be honest as he has a good record for Denmark and had a good Euro's.

There are alot of Clubs that want him, but he wants to keep his wage and wants CL...which he never gonna get, rotting at Juv atm

Ch L yeah I suppose.
Would not have thought 52k a week was a stumbling block for clubs though.
Either way I think if we can get rid of some of the players that are not in Wengers plans anymore Wenger will be more agressive in the transfer market. Not forgetting the guys on loan as well and the likes of Flappy :facepalm:

I think it will be a factor in how Wenger approaches this transfer period.

by Sponsored content

arshavin and Chamakh?

arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?

Re: arshavin and Chamakh?