Would you rather have....

Romario.

Insigne or Dybala?

Dybala

Nakata or Ali Karimi

Nakata

For Inter fans : Ibra or Milito ( whose legacy is greater ? )

Sina wrote:Dybala

Nakata or Ali Karimi

Nakata, I guess was consistent over a longer period; though Karimi was more talented.

Firmino or Lacazette???

firmino...but only cause i haven't really watched lacazette. so i may be wrong on this.

ibra's legacy is greater than milito's...milito  did well in the treble, but it felt more like a group/coach effort. ibra too had a good group, but his ability to outshine his teammates with the moments he had was great. i feel inter was his peak...plus after the first year milito kind of faded a bit

sticking with the inter theme; u've got a last minute free kick, who do u go with?

recoba or mihajlovic

Mihajlovic

Recober while being more talented and technical, was less consistent and mihajlovic just seemed to have a higher footballing I.Q.

Carlos or maldini?

carlos...i'm a madrid fan

Maldini. Best LB of all time.

Vardy or Bacca (Similar age, both late bloomers)

Bacca

Cafu or D. Alves?

Alves
Alba or Alaba

Alaba. Far better player.

Gaizka Mendieta or Rui Costa

cafu over alves
rui costa over mendieta (even though mendieta was a bad man at valencia, let's nor forget that)

patrick vieira or roy keane

Roy Keane

While Vieira was more complete , Keane affected the game more imo.


Makalele or Redondo

Adit wrote:Roy Keane

While Vieira was more complete , Keane affected the game more imo.


Makalele or Redondo

redondo because he was more versatile (attacking+defensive)

redondo or pirlo

pirlo....whilst i really liked redondo; and i'm not that big a fan of prilo's, the threat he posed when it came to set pieces especially from his latter milan years to juve can't be ignored. redondo's tougher, more defensively astute, and can hold the ball. pirlo can distribute, dictate play, but the set pieces and free kicks, just wonderful to watch...i'd go with pirlo, though i think they'd have complemented each other with redondo as dm....injuries at milan and a good midfield in 03 didn't allow that

roy makaay or diego forlan

roy makaay over forlan cause he was more deadly in finishing & he performed in all clubs he played with

greece 2004 or chile 2015

Greece 2004 that campaigne was just insane

Henry or suarez

Henry

Neymar or Ronaldinho

Neymar. A better footballer in my eyes and will only get better from here on (speed, goals, pace, assists, better work ethic, better otb movement, trophies, just as technical, equally talented and just as enjoyable too). But dinho will win on legacy since he's older and has played more and through his peak.

but hey, this is bankz so I might be bias here

Maradonna or cruyff?

Bankz wrote:Neymar a better footballer in my eyes and just as enjoyable too, but hey, this is bankz so I might be bias here

Maradonna or cruyff?

maradona over cruyff cause he was proven in not so elite team like napoli

england 1998 or england 2002

Lol easy england 98. England 02 was the definition of underwhelming tbh... Plus england 98 had the exciting michael owen and peak david seaman.

Robbie Fowler or torres (for liverpool)

Bankz wrote:Lol easy england 98. England 02 was the definition of underwhelming tbh... Plus england 98 had the exciting michael owen and peak david seaman.

Robbie Fowler or torres (for liverpool)

easy, torres over fowler, although fowler a very good player

turkey wc 2002 or turkey euro 2008