BREXIT Premier League 17-18 Discussion Part 8

CBarca wrote:

Unique wrote:

CBarca wrote:I'm not really sure what you're on about...?

What ban? Kane hasn't mugged anyone, been red carded, or done anything bad whatsoever

he should have been banned for the dive in the Liverpool game or have the FA scrapped that already

Your own goalkeeper admitted to making contact with Kane lol

And every referee and FA official has agreed with Jon Moss on the calls since that game so I don't think they're about to ban Kane for it

dude it was a dive. Even your manager admitted he told Kane to dive.

It's not worth getting into lol this is so old, stop whining and get on with your life.

CBarca wrote:It's not worth getting into lol this is so old, stop whining and get on with your life.

I got over it the second it happened. But just be a man and admit you got lucky with the ref in the game.

Been consistently the second best team all season but the performances of late are alarming. Need to get back on track ASAP, because IMO Spurs are gonna finish the season strongly now and I wouldn't be shocked if they finish second. Not too worried about Chelsea as I think they are horrific (inb4 masterclass against us next week) Loserpool are Loserpool and will lose against Watford and the like a few times before the end of the season so it balances with our own gash performances. Top 4 race is heating up.

CBarca wrote:I've never seen a club complain more about a result than Pool fans about the Spurs result

This is why people don't like Pool

I used to think our fan bases (Madrid and Barcelona respectfully) were the chief moaners in the club football scene but I think Pool fans have to take the cake with this one. They are still bitching. All now. As I typed this.

Also, if Utd lose 2nd place to Liverpool, that 25% RG gave Unique is gonna disappear as he is gonna harass Firenze till kingdom come. Don't think the latter is ready for it.

Its only Unique btw who's been talking about it since last Sunday. Just saying.

lol, I don't care enough to report anyone and I don't think RG cares enough to police the forum unless it's outright offensive behavior. I'm not going to rule out the possibility of Pool finishing second because Salah is the best player in the world IMO. Could carry them there. Gun to my head though, I think Spurs will, we finish third and Pool fourth.

El Gunner wrote:

CBarca wrote:I'm not really sure what you're on about...?

What ban? Kane hasn't mugged anyone, been red carded, or done anything bad whatsoever

Didn't he make a very bad challenge on someone the brexit game before yesterday?

No haha.

Nishankly wrote:Its only Unique btw who's been talking about it since last Sunday. Just saying.

I can admit that once past past game day and the day after Nish has been pretty good. Unique is awful though. It's not that though, it's Pool fans all over the internet. I assume most people here moderately browse r/soccer (I occasionally do, think the place is an absolute cesspool tbh) and it was disgusting over there and Pool fans I know have been unbearable for far longer than I'd expect. I'm speaking in generalities.

CBarca wrote:

El Gunner wrote:

CBarca wrote:I'm not really sure what you're on about...?

What ban? Kane hasn't mugged anyone, been red carded, or done anything bad whatsoever

Didn't he make a very bad challenge on someone the brexit game before yesterday?

No haha.

Nishankly wrote:Its only Unique btw who's been talking about it since last Sunday. Just saying.

I can admit that once past past game day and the day after Nish has been pretty good. Unique is awful though. It's not that though, it's Pool fans all over the internet. I assume most people here moderately browse r/soccer (I occasionally do, think the place is an absolute cesspool tbh) and it was disgusting over there and Pool fans I know have been unbearable for far longer than I'd expect. I'm speaking in generalities.

you’re a nascar fan that calls football soccer. Your arguments are invalid

Aguero has 21 in the league this season but 10 have come in 3 matches. Sterling has 15 PL goals wow.

Where does this attack stand compared to PL winning attacks of other seasons?

I don't know about the numbers, but I think this Man City attack is the best I've ever seen in the Prem.

Prisoner of the moment tbh, the midfield you can make an argument for but not their attack.

El Gunner wrote:Andy Cole and Dwight Yorke?

Not even the best partnership of Andy Cole's career.

El Gunner wrote:

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:Prisoner of the moment tbh, the midfield you can make an argument for but not their attack.

Doesn't beat our Invincibles midfield, sorry.

I mean you were 5 when that team existed lol, also pointless in comparing as the improvement in tactics, physical and mental training would mean they would wipe the floor with Arsenal.

But it's not a fair comparison for that very reason, the past is at a disadvantage due to advancements that time allows for.

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:Prisoner of the moment tbh, the midfield you can make an argument for but not their attack.

What does "prisoner of the moment" mean?
What does this post mean?
I do not comprehend.

no way Chelsea can lose to West Brom tonight, right? if they do Conte is absolutely getting fired

El Gunner wrote:

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:

El Gunner wrote:

Doesn't beat our Invincibles midfield, sorry.

I mean you were 5 when that team existed lol, also pointless in comparing as the improvement in tactics, physical and mental training would mean they would wipe the floor with Arsenal.

But it's not a fair comparison for that very reason, the past is at a disadvantage due to advancements that time allows for.

Then according to your logic, why have the argument in the first place, because every reasonably outstanding midfield of the current day of time would be better than those of the past.

And correction: I was 6 to 7. I started watching football when I was 4, so I have memories, and I can apply my current knowledge of tactical analysis to those, thank you very much.

I agree tbh, i do find these arguments very silly. Also when you are that young you don't comprehend things very well.

Don't take it too personally i felt the same about teams when i was 5-7 but looking back i think i can confidently say my heart ruled my brain at that time.

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:

El Gunner wrote:

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:Prisoner of the moment tbh, the midfield you can make an argument for but not their attack.

Doesn't beat our Invincibles midfield, sorry.

I mean you were 5 when that team existed lol, also pointless in comparing as the improvement in tactics, physical and mental training would mean they would wipe the floor with Arsenal.

But it's not a fair comparison for that very reason, the past is at a disadvantage due to advancements that time allows for.

Are you trying to say every aspect of the game in the current time is better than the past ? I highly disagree if so.

Nope, but the tactical and preparation aspect is. Which gives everyone coming through now a distinct advantage the past weren't privy to.

It will be the same for teams in 5 years, it's just the process of evolution. It's why i don't like the whole best ever stuff, it's just a very flawed discussion which ignores basically everything around it.

City's current attack is definitely one of the best I have seen but not the best.

RealGunner wrote:City's current attack is definitely one of the best I have seen but not the best.

What's better? Ronaldo's United? Henry's Arsenal? This City side might trump both of them.

Pires-Henry-Bergkamp and Tevez-Rooney-Ronaldo were both superior.