The Official Dwayne Wade <<<<<< you thread

I don’t know why pure saying it hasn’t been a problem before. I’ve always thought it was wrong when the players are on their current contract with NBA teams and even as they’ve played unofficial games with teams, as both Simmons and Griffin did.

If Randle could’ve been rookie in his second season it would’ve been less of an advantage because he was injured all year. Simmons was healthy and played with the team for five months before Mitchell was even drafted. That means something.

I’d even give Mitchell the edge over Simmons at this point if they were both rookies. I think what he’s done is more impressive because he seemlessly fit into a new team where he hadn’t played with anyone before. To be the best offensive player in the third seed in the best conference is ridiculous as a rookie. Especially when the team lost their best player and actually got better after. They’ve had the best record in the NBA since they gave him the keys and Gobert came back.

So done with these refs. Happy the season is over tbh

El Gunner wrote:is co-rookie winners a thing. Because I'd be fine with that.

I love both. But if I had to choose one for this award, I'd go with Mitchell.

Happened with Jason Kidd and Grant Hill. Highly unlikely to ever happen again though.

He's still probably got a solid 5-6 month edge playing on an NBA team. Not to mention NBA level coaching, getting on with teammates, adjusting to the league etc

It doesn't really matter to me tbh, but it's not an even race for Mitchell vs Simmons. Simmons clearly got a head start that Mitchell didn't.

Dat coaching when you are walking in a massive protective boot.

You, Freeza need to stop acting he was healthy all season and they purposefully held him out.

Even the NBA travel point is completely negated by the point for months he spent rehabbing.

For example Boogie is not even in the same state as any of our team atm lol.

What part of the league is he adjusting too? The only real argument you can make is the team mates part tbh.

All in all its just a massive pile of excuses from people who are butt hurt Simmons is better.

Not a rookie arguments would actually be OK if it wasn't just this season when people started bitching about it just because they know Simmons is better and can't accept it, so they start bitching about something which is and has been accepted rule since the beginning of time.

As I said before based on the dumb as shit logic we can Revoke Bird and Robinson's rookie of the year campaign too and loads more.

Revoking Bird I wouldn't hate, but it's not the same case. There's a difference between not being on the team and being on the team.
There's a difference between a redshirt and someone not on a team.

And Let's stop acting like Ben Simmons wasn't healthy by february.

Hope they make it a draft class award going forward tbh.

And this hasn't only been an argument this year. I don't know why keep saying that. People were saying that about Embiid, Griffin even back then.

And yeah 12 months of coaching makes no difference. They don't have to learn defense, plays and the system. Didn't help one bit. If they didn't have stability in terms of coaching it wouldn't have been as big of an advantage though. Saying it didn't help him is like saying Rodgers didn't benefit immensely from redshirting a couple years in Green Bay.

If you watched NFL, would you think redshirt QBs should be rookies?

Tactics, plays etc are a factor in basketball lol. Of course it's an advantage to be learning those from your coaching staff even if you're injured.

The redshirt analogy isn't far off tbh

I couldn't care less who wins, but I do find the idea of "rookies" in their second season a bit off.

I acknowledge that it's harsh to discount people like Embiid, Simmons because they got injured in their first year, but it's also harsh to those who are true rookies to have them up against players who aren't really in their first season.

For me, given that most players who are up for ROY are in the latter category, it makes sense to favor that set of players.

Simmons is generational talent. If you do consider him a rookie, he wins. If you don't consider him a rookie, Mitchell wins.

To me, Simmons is not a rookie, not truly, but he would've won it last season, the season before, probably next season and beyond, he's that good.

Mitchell is great too and more what would you consider a rookie of the year type. He's just not better than Simmons

Simmons? Mitchell? Pff give it to my boy Andre Ingram.

urbaNRoots wrote:Simmons? Mitchell? Pff give it to my boy Andre Ingram.

Cried so much watching his story before the game. And then he was incredible in the game and his wife was so emotional during the in-game interview.

Best story of the season. Good way of rounding out the season with an emotional story after that story about Tristan Thompson cheating on Khloe. Maybe she should just consider a boring white guy at this point

El Gunner wrote:

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:All in all its just a massive pile of excuses from people who are butt hurt Simmons is better.

Simmons is a better overall player, no doubt. We can see the impact that he has, and he will most probably go down to be the more successful and impactful player of the two in question.

But this is rookie of the season with emphasis on season. Yea, Simmons is better. Yea, you can argue he has had a better season as well. But has he really? I think it is a genuine debate considering the type of team Mitchell found himself in and how he established himself in that team when he was the 13th pick overall, and how he has looked so matured so quickly in a team when he has not been around as long as Simmons has been with his team.

I even love the boy more for what he did with that sweatshirt. Goes to show he wants the attention, and he is hungry to be the best and fight the opposition around him.

It's actually Rookie of the year. And the year now is 2018.

In 2018 Jazz has the best record and mitchell has like 23ppg  

Confirmed


Also the sweatshirt is something every Jazz fan should be estatic about. It's the most people have talked about them in their history. Mitchell is a star. Love him. Only player I'd pick over Lonzo from this draft class in a re-draft.

Bucks out here losing on purpose

Not watching the game but just looked at the score

Bucks are shit, but I don't think they're that shit, especially when we beat the Embiid-less 76ers like a month and a half ago. I imagine we must have #7 on lock if we lose?

If that's true I'm all for it

Both Wizards and Heat are losing rn

If they all lose Bucks stay in 6...

Close game in Minnesota

Refs out here gifting Wolves the win. Nuggets getting hammered on every shot. Meanwhile Wolves are getting to the line every time.

Fultz with a triple double off the bench...

We beat San Antonio pretty easily now hopefully Utah beat Portland so we play the Blazers in the first round.

Fittingly Denver and Minnesota is in OT coming down to one last possession.

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS 7 SEED

Well done Milwaukee, you played this end of season run well

THE DROUGHT IS FINALLY OVER

YOUR MINNESOTA TIMBERWOLVES ARE IN THE PLAYOFFS

HISTORIC NIGHT

So unless I'm *bleep* things up these are the match ups.

Rockets-Wolves
Warriors-Spurs.
Jazz-Thunder (either 3-6 or 4-5)
Blazers-Pelicans (either 3-6 or 4-5)



Raptors- Wizards
Celtics- Bucks
76ers - Heat
Cavs - Pacers

Warriors-Spurs would be sooooo fun, if Kawhi wasn't injured but I guess we are not allowed nice things.

Playoffs not gonna be the same without André Ingram