Re: One thing stopped Barca

by Brady2Moss Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:19 am

billionmillion wrote:brady moss actually you believe what you are talking about? barca were the team that wanted it more than anyone. chelsea would not be so upset if they lost to barca as their players admitted that barca were the better team

and after 2 lose you think barcelona didnt want to win it more than chelsea, they never lost 2 games in a row, in this game they were hungry more than anybody

finally first learn what is luck before commenting, you keep talking about crap shooting but you dont know that even the worst shooter has 50/50 chance to score. "crap shooter" iniesta scored in his first try in 2009. crap shooters also can save the game, but why not this time because this time no much luck team got triple more chances than 2009

Well, if Barca wanted it more, they should have won then. Simple. Real winners don't let LUCK decide their destiny! If this was roulette, I would agree and say Barca were unlucky, but this was a football match for crying out loud! If matches depended on luck, then Barcelona must be the LUCKIEST team in the world!

by Brady2Moss Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:21 am

billionmillion wrote:chelsea style was superior and barca got about 10 clear chances against chelseas's superios style. and you say with better finishers barca would score. so where is logic? if chelsea's style let barca create 10 clear chances how it was superior style? i see you have very little education

It was superior for the simple fact that Barca's offense was inferior!

by billionmillion Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:28 am

Brady2Moss wrote:
billionmillion wrote:brady moss actually you believe what you are talking about? barca were the team that wanted it more than anyone. chelsea would not be so upset if they lost to barca as their players admitted that barca were the better team

and after 2 lose you think barcelona didnt want to win it more than chelsea, they never lost 2 games in a row, in this game they were hungry more than anybody

finally first learn what is luck before commenting, you keep talking about crap shooting but you dont know that even the worst shooter has 50/50 chance to score. "crap shooter" iniesta scored in his first try in 2009. crap shooters also can save the game, but why not this time because this time no much luck team got triple more chances than 2009

Well, if Barca wanted it more, they should have won then. Simple. Real winners don't let LUCK decide their destiny! If this was roulette, I would agree and say Barca were unlucky, but this was a football match for crying out loud! If matches depended on luck, then Barcelona must be the LUCKIEST team in the world!

after creating 10 chances and loosing you can say you didnt have luck. you can not say it if you dont create single chance whole game. if chelsea lost you could not say they were unlucky. it depends where you say it. just stop wasting my time with immature comments

by billionmillion Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:32 am

Brady2Moss wrote:
billionmillion wrote:chelsea style was superior and barca got about 10 clear chances against chelseas's superios style. and you say with better finishers barca would score. so where is logic? if chelsea's style let barca create 10 clear chances how it was superior style? i see you have very little education

It was superior for the simple fact that Barca's offense was inferior!

So chelsea's style: "We hope that barcelona players will miss"
Great superior style

by alexjanosik Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:32 am

Brady2Moss wrote:
BarcaKizz wrote:1. How does scoring goals show you want it more??? It shows they are clinical, and our defence lapsed in concentration at key times. A lack of hunger isn't evidenced by how clinical you are, its about how much effort they seem to put in. Barca players didn't disappoint their fans with their attitude. No lack of hunger. End of story.

2. When they went through there was a collection of bad misses, great saves from Cech and shots against woodwork. An extremely unusual collection. Very rarely does this happen. Put aside possession, possession is our mechanism for control, but its not why we claim that we are always the dominant team. What we had was more chances to win this tie than Chelsea, simple as that.

You're right, the scoreboard talks, we all know that. When you have that many chances to win and the other team has so few, and you end up losing... you feel injustice, as if the game is fair. Everyone knows this, stop talking as if you're some sort of robot. Every single Chelsea player knows it as well.

Chelsea played to their own strength (defence), just as Barca did to theirs (attack) and ultimately, Chlesea's style was the superior of the two. Please, stop with all the "Barca deserved to go through because of this and that" nonsense...that's just losers talk.

Chelsea parked the bus.We played the game the only way its supposed to be played,the Johan Cruyff way.
We were the far superior team and deserved to go through.
Pls dont troll here.

by BarcaKizz Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:32 am

Yeah OK cool... So now you make up things that I said. I'm trying to explain to you why people believe that luck exists in the world and in football. Don't believe it, but don't act like everyone else is an idiot for saying it exists. Almost everyone in the world of football will say you have lucky days and unlucky days.

"If Barca wanted it more, they should have won".

Are you serious man??? You think the team that wants it more wins every game?

All this 'real winners' business... what nonsense.

by Lord Awesome Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:35 am

I agree with Billion Million that the lost against Chelsea was down to some bad luck. 4 posts that could have easily turned the tide, guys. 4. Of course I can't just blame it on pure luck, though. Another thing that halted Barca was decisiveness. Too many shots went Cechs way and several others were put wide. And that was the general census of the game.

by BarcaKizz Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:37 am

Yep. Nobody here blames it purely on luck, but Brady2Moss rejects that luck doesn't even exist in football so yeah...

by Lord Awesome Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:41 am

Luck exists. It's true. Laughing

There's chance and there's luck.

by Brady2Moss Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:43 am

Well, you all saw it tonight folks, even the greatest talent in the world cannot stand toe to toe with the pure determination and will to succeed. On any given Sunday...

Maybe, you guys can learn a thing or two...that winning is not about luck.

by Lord Awesome Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:45 am

Brady2Moss wrote:
Maybe, you guys can learn a thing or two...that winning is not about luck.

Sometimes it is. smoking

Like today.

by Brady2Moss Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:51 am

BarcaKizz wrote:Yep. Nobody here blames it purely on luck, but Brady2Moss rejects that luck doesn't even exist in football so yeah...

I know luck exist in football, but to say that Chelsea won because of luck is entirely false. The simple reason Barca lost is that they were poor in front of goal..

by Lord Awesome Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:53 am

Brady2Moss wrote:
BarcaKizz wrote:Yep. Nobody here blames it purely on luck, but Brady2Moss rejects that luck doesn't even exist in football so yeah...

I know luck exist in football, but to say that Chelsea won because of luck is entirely false. The simple reason Barca lost is that they were poor in front of goal. and the 4 posts that in another day could have decided to bounce in.

33% Luck
67% Chelsea

That's how I see it.

by BarcaKizz Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:56 am

Again making things up... I can make up things you said as well and argue against them... How fun...

/thread.

by Sponsored content