Re: Suarez Bites Again

by Rebelles.REUS.rex Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:17 pm

mr-r34 wrote:If it was terry he would of only got 5 games, just saying.

NO

Suarez bites once 8 game ban, bites 2nd time should by 16+

by Zealous Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:17 pm

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:Considering he got a 7 game ban for racism and warned to his future conduct could it be argued he is lucky he didn't get more

Not saying i agree with that, just wonder if anyone agrees with the theory.

I agree with it completely. Suarez was already on thin ice as it is. This whole incident was always going to get a harsh reaction.

He still deserves it.

by Rebelles.REUS.rex Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:19 pm

AbraKebabra Alacalamb wrote:Come on, i'm not in the "Kill suarez" bandwagon or anything but he BIT somebody ffs. It's savage. Yeah you can argue that somebody going in for a very rough tackle is more dangerous but at the end of the day football involves tackling not biting.

He... bit somebody, people don't seem to understand how messed up that is.

by jibers Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:26 pm

Farcical decision. FA are a joke

by Rebelles.REUS.rex Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:26 pm

mr-r34 wrote:
Lex wrote:I can't stress the severity of the offence enough

he BIT someone

he purposely sunk his teeth into a human being's flesh and attempted to extract a portion of his being.

he willingly clamped his canines onto another person's dermis and proceeded to eviscerate him

what did he expect to get?

Bloody hell the over exaggeration here. Have you seen his bloody teeth, if he wanted to extract a portion of him would of done it with ease.

FFS hazard assaulted a kid and only got 3 games.

MORON

by izzy Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:28 pm

He deserved the 10 games for the simple reason that he bit someone AGAIN.

It baffles me. He done it AGAIN.

by Lex Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:29 pm

mr-r34 wrote:Bloody hell the over exaggeration here. Have you seen his bloody teeth, if he wanted to extract a portion of him would of done it with ease

Ah so that was just a warning bite? "watch out, Ivanovic, next time, it'll be srs bzns"?

by Swanhends Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:30 pm

Lex wrote:
mr-r34 wrote:Bloody hell the over exaggeration here. Have you seen his bloody teeth, if he wanted to extract a portion of him would of done it with ease
Ah so that was just a warning bite? "watch out, Ivanovic, next time, it'll be srs bzns"?

The lad was just 'aving a nibble Laughing

by Raptorgunner Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:30 pm

Zealous wrote:RAWK LOL

for christ sake a bite is an action you can even use in lovemaking. I've bitten my wife on the odd occasion during a passionate one to one

by Lex Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:30 pm

izzy wrote:He deserved the 10 games for the simple reason that he bit someone AGAIN.

It baffles me. He done it AGAIN.

But.....but......he didn't draw blood this time, surely that should be taken in to account?

by Onyx Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:34 pm

Suarez can still appeal for the additional 7 games he got banned for.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22278258

by izzy Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:38 pm

Yohan Modric wrote:Suarez can still appeal for the additional 7 games he got banned for.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22278258

Appeal what though?

"Oh, it should be reduced because I didn't draw blood and said i'm so sorry?"

It amazes me that people are defending this nonsense.

by Adit Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:24 pm

He is tarnishing Liverpool's Image. He really needs psychiatric help.

by Emaharg Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:42 pm

This whole thing just makes me laugh while yes biting is a disgusting act just because it's Suarez its blown up.

Ivanovic wasn't going to die or his career wasn't going to be over, we have seen elbows to the face, peoples legs broken and players being punched/kicked none received a 10 match ban.

5 matches maximum is fair in my opinion hopefully it does get reduced.

by RealGunner Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:48 pm

FA the disgrace

Absolute joke decision

by Lex Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:57 pm

Emaharg wrote:This whole thing just makes me laugh while yes biting is a disgusting act just because it's Suarez its blown up

Well...........yeah? Repeat offenders tend to get less sympathy than first time offenders

by LeBéninois Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:58 pm

10 !!! TEN GAMES !! Damn , i don't like the guy but this is UNFAIR

i'm so upset right now !!!

by stevieg8 Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:04 pm

Lex wrote:
Emaharg wrote:This whole thing just makes me laugh while yes biting is a disgusting act just because it's Suarez its blown up
Well...........yeah? Repeat offenders tend to get less sympathy than first time offenders

The FA has said they won't consider actions taken in a different country. Time for a new rationalization.

by stevieg8 Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:07 pm

I'd also like to point out that this thread is now a full 4 pages long than the equivalent thread on McManaman.

Although I'm not complaining, aside from Lex/Zealous/Rebellus it's been pretty hilarious.

by Blue Barrett Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:09 pm

Lex wrote:
Emaharg wrote:This whole thing just makes me laugh while yes biting is a disgusting act just because it's Suarez its blown up
Well...........yeah? Repeat offenders tend to get less sympathy than first time offenders

I thought this was common knowledge? Why else do you lot think Barton was banned 12 games and not 5 or 6?

stevieg8 wrote:
Lex wrote:
Emaharg wrote:This whole thing just makes me laugh while yes biting is a disgusting act just because it's Suarez its blown up
Well...........yeah? Repeat offenders tend to get less sympathy than first time offenders

The FA has said they won't consider actions taken in a different country. Time for a new rationalization.

I doubt they took into account him biting someone else in another country. Suarez has a history of inappropriate conduct with the FA. That's what Lex is saying.

by urbaNRoots Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:10 pm

Stupid FA is stupid, nothing new really.

by Blue Barrett Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:10 pm

I would have gone 8 or 9 games but 10 games is okay imo. Anything more than that would have been outrageous and unfair. 10 games is just about the limit they could have gone.

by BarcaLearning Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:18 pm

This is ridiculous.... Suarez was wrong but the punishments same as last time are blown out of proportion everything, media doesnt help, I feel bad for the guy and Liverpool suffers more bad luck....

The FA is a joke once again....

by Rebelles.REUS.rex Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:20 pm

Art Morte wrote:When the FA said a three match ban was clearly insufficient I knew it was going to be a minimum of seven games. I'm a little disappointed at it being as long as 10 games, but not shocked nor do I think it's outrageous. I actually think the FA got this one more or less correct, if I'm being completely objective here.

stevieg8 wrote:I'd also like to point out that this thread is now a full 4 pages long than the equivalent thread on McManaman.

Although I'm not complaining, aside from Lex/Zealous/Rebellus it's been pretty hilarious.

Suarez is more well known and controversial + biting is much more rare than a dirty tackle

by iNFINITY9910 Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:20 pm

Gil wrote:He's a ~~thug~~ ZOMBIE and got what he deserved.

This is how a zombie apocalypse is gonna happen...

by McAgger Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:52 pm

Man there goes our chances of doing anything next season. Ffs he'll miss 6 games next season at the start. That's already more than 1/5th of the league over. Sad

by Sponsored content