Suarez Bites No More (we can but hope)

Doc wrote:Football really does have its own reality. Bite someone on the road and you can actually be charged by the police. Bite someone on the field, posters on a internet forum demand you get banned for (insert time frame of your own choosing).

Emotions are quite high but anything other than a 5 match ban from FIFA would be over kill. What's that, he got a 8 match ban in England? Yeah, in England. From the English FA (or EPL or whoever makes the decisions in that country). They set their own precedent that technically FIFA is not obliged to follow. What's that again, something about law and precedents?! Silly billy, that's for the real world, football has it's own reality remember...

I like to think I'm the only one here who is indifferent to anything Suarez does and would like to focus more on the fact that Godin, once again, scored when it really matters.

Scored when it mattered, after Italy were destroyed by a farce red card and a Suarez bite with no card given. See, you cant focus solely on the goals when ref decisions messed up this game.

Farce red card? Marchisio kicked the man in the shins. Intentional or not, that was hella dangerous stuff. How the ref saw that and not Suarez enjoying the taste of dear George is absolutely beyond me...

Ill let my main Arq explain that:

"In slow motion, anything can be produced as a more viable card in any spectrum of officiating. A 'stomp' is your Tibial condial compressing to actually produce a kick against your own weight and onto a certain object. In the case of Marchisio, having your calf being intercepted by an oncoming player in the intention of winning the ball, is NOT a Red Card in any dimension, a straight yellow justifiable yet of course this visually impaired Mexican felt entitled to produce a decision that completely changed Italia's plan upside-down.

Subsequently, Luis Suarez with his third reaction to seeking piquant flavour in an opposition individual, was ignored despite Cheillini clearly producing evidence of bite marks that even a Badger would struggle to perform."

Are the Italians complaining about farce decisions not going their way? LOL.

mr-r34 wrote:Are the Italians complaining about farce decisions not going their way? LOL.

I dont know what your getting on about. The red card was clearly bullshit and Suarez bit a man without getting any card whatsoever.

@ chad, i care less about his dribbles or clips, i'm a fan of watching players play, clips can make heskey look like baggio...however, as a neutral i want to see a good world cup (and it hasn't disappointed so far), i also want to see the top players play (still sad ibra and falcao couldn't make the tournament)...as far as suarez is concerned, i havent said what he's done is right, or should be accepted but as a neutral i want to see what the players have in their locker....a regular season i would have cared little, as i know i'll still see top players play...but i'd like to see colombia vs uruguay with all their stars playing, maybe that's a little selfish and unethical of me...i understand fans who are all about the morals of the game wanting him banned, and i can accept their arguments, but some could have other reasons they want him banned for a ridiculous length of time (lool ten games, for life, ban carrying over to the premiership), maybe so he doesnt face their team, or their favorite player...but to be honest, i have the tendency to role with the villians for the sake of seeing a good mundial....i remember supporting diego at italia 90 when his hand ball against yugoslavia wasn't spotted, i also supported rivaldo's fake (lmao) against turkey when that wasn't spotted, cos i wanted to see the good players on show...i'm less concerned about the ethos (which is probably not a good thing), im more interested in my team winning (madrid) ,seeing a good mundial, or seeing teams that i dont like getting knocked out (Spain, italy, england, ivory coast, japan etc).

Magic Spray wrote:

Fußball wrote:Very good. Lowering his transfer fee to Barca.

He'll fit in nicely at Barca.

Yes because our forwards have a history of running around bitting people

chad4401 wrote:barca going full retard , that lack of class never gets boring small club mentality

Yes because the club wrote everything that was in the tabloids

I like how he's a Liverpool player, and everyone is trashing Barca

Like wtf does this have to do with us? Rumors come up we are interested and now we are a shit club cause of what Suarez does at the World Cup? He's not even our player. We are linked to a number of guys, so what they aren't our guys yet and most of these rumors won't even materialize. Some of ya'll people and ya'lls hate for anything Barcelona is utterly ridiculous lol

all of a sudden Madrid were never interested in him and never once were reported to buy him this whole year  
and correct me if i'm wrong but you have pepe and ramos in your team and somehow we are the scum? xD

@Juveman
Few things I disagree with Arq, that is one of them. Like totally disagree but in the fairness of a forum and my good nature, you guys saw your team got knocked out in not so favourable circumstances so I'll leave it as an agree to disagree.

Ok, no worries.

Hm. The referee's nickname is "Dracula". So obviously he was just protecting one of his own.

http://www.julienews.it/azzurri-rosa/index.php/200196-look-dracula-marco-antonio-rodriguez-moreno/

Cut the Barca/Madrid posts, guys.

Stay Ot and discuss Suarez.

Clearly, this is the British Media's fault. How dare they broadcast a game in which Suarez bit an opponent (again)

All just a ploy to attack Suarez' immaculate character IMO, just like Suarez said

A better angle of Suarez bit.

That was the one on Ivanov, though

maybe he saw some caramel spread on chiellini's shoulder?

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/worldcup/uruguays-world-cup-squad-gets-40-kilos-of-caramel-spread-confiscated-9544050.html

rwo power wrote:That was the one on Ivanov, though

I know.  

Where is Sepi the "class" police?


I need to see you defend this piece of shit.

Casciavit wrote:

Not sure if photoshopped

Also you people do realize this is photoshopped, right?

lol at you still defending your psychopath player.

That one's photoshop but Chiellini did have a red spot and a faint scar.

Is it a coincidence that all his targets are horrible ****.   

This guy is such an anti hero

Ivanovic is a "horrible ****"? Since when?

"I guess any part of the body is up for eating," wrote Holyfield, whose ear was partly chomped off by rival Mike Tyson in a 1997 heavyweight fight.

Source: https://sports.yahoo.com/news/bite-victim-holyfield-joins-twitter-talk-jaws-suarez-234457760--sow.html