Re: Torres vs RVP

by Raptorgunner Fri Jul 29, 2011 7:51 pm

ynwa wrote:
Not saying Torres is better than RVP, or RVP is better than Torres, they're both class in their own way but they're two different types of forwards. One's a poacher/finisher, while the other likes to help build up play and finish when asked.

I thinks that's the Arsenal way, we dont have any Poachers, its good to have one.

by Bear Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:43 pm

To say Torres has only ever been a poacher is wrong IMO. Over time with the constant injures and lack of confidence he's been afraid to try the dribbles & long shots he used to but in his first season with Liverpool he was a monster.

by Abramovich Fri Jul 29, 2011 10:52 pm

Torres when he was in Liverpool was beasting it was just tooo awesome but thats another lifetime and his healthy prime will never return.

by Ganso Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:07 pm

clearly rvp,but when torres was in form he was a beast.

whenever he was in front of goal,the opposition fans sh*t themselves because he simply wasnt a striker who missed a lot of sitters.

by Red Alert Sat Jul 30, 2011 3:40 am

Bear-Felix wrote:To say Torres has only ever been a poacher is wrong IMO. Over time with the constant injures and lack of confidence he's been afraid to try the dribbles & long shots he used to but in his first season with Liverpool he was a monster.

Never said he's only been a poacher. He's a complete forward. One of the best I've seen. But all I ment was he's more than a poacher than RVP. I could see how that could of confused you though. :\

It was 2AM when I wrote that. Sleep

by Bear Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:19 am

It was more directed at mole who said:

He's one-dimensional only knows how to run thing run behind the defence and hope a through ball comes. everything he has achieved in football is down to Stevie G.

by Sponsored content

who is better