Liverpool

bet he cant wait to count his bonus after those 2 goals

Zealous wrote:

mr-r34 wrote:The lesson learnt here today was, don't be a fool at least wait till the arsenal game was over, cause then you'll just look like a dickhead , like gil has shown.

After some time has passed it seems Gil wasn't completely wrong in his assessment.

You on the other hand could use some of your own advice LOL

Actually no, i didn't make a thread laughing at a team, based on what non liverpool fans say about them, and then watch my team perform as bad. So yeah no.

St_Nick09_of_Goal wrote:

aford92 wrote:

St_Nick09_of_Goal wrote:

aford92 wrote:As if Tottenham fans think this is a good achievement. Liverpool only have 9 men ffs. When Liverpool had 11 men it was only 1-0. They need to have 2 men sent off to score another 2 though.

Spurs fans = Most delusional fans in the world.

this isnt a fair way to look at things. It doesnt matter how many liverpool players are left on the pitch, the game started 11 v 11, and Liverpool players couldnt handle the sauce.

It's a perfectly fair way to look at it. If Liverpool still had 11 players Spurs would not be 3 goals ahead.

How do you know that? DO you happen to have a magic crystal ball? The IF scenarios are never relevant after facts. I do recall Ade missing a sitter, what if he had scored? maybe it would be 5-0 by now...

pool players had to be dirty to compete, i know it's a gross exaggeration, but they got red carded because they couldnt handle it.

It's the Gareth Bale situation all over again. He got stupid amounts of praise and hype for having a few good games, now Spurs beat a team with 9 men and now they getting loads of praise, it's ridiculous.

Also, no I haven't got a crystal ball that allows me to see the "what if" scenarios but a few of Spurs' goals came because they had more space due to Liverpool only having 9 players. Defoe's goal in particular came because Liverpool had less players.

aford92 wrote:

It's the Gareth Bale situation all over again. He got stupid amounts of praise and hype for having a few good games, now Spurs beat a team with 9 men and now they getting loads of praise, it's ridiculous.

Also, no I haven't got a crystal ball that allows me to see the "what if" scenarios but a few of Spurs' goals came because they had more space due to Liverpool only having 9 players. Defoe's goal in particular came because Liverpool had less players.

you are taking things out of proportion, and you are doing it all by yourself.

Tottenham just blew Liverpool out of the water, that's the only thing people are saying.

The gareth Bale situation as you call it, would be people talking about Spurs as title contenders because they trashed Liverpool.

Did the ref unfairly take out Liverpool players? you sound as if it's unfair they were 9 v 11 and didnt deserve to be trashed. What happens after doesnt matter, game started 11 v 11, and ended 4-0. How do you know if Defoe wouldnt have score two 30m screamers to take it 5-0 with 11 men? IF scenarios... circle jerk bs my friend.

liverpool continue to go no-where fast, but dont what is expected of this fairly new and young squad.

It will take time to get back on track and become serious contenders again, not just there to scrap for a 4th spot in the league.

Andy Cannot for 35mill??

St_Nick09_of_Goal wrote:

aford92 wrote:

It's the Gareth Bale situation all over again. He got stupid amounts of praise and hype for having a few good games, now Spurs beat a team with 9 men and now they getting loads of praise, it's ridiculous.

Also, no I haven't got a crystal ball that allows me to see the "what if" scenarios but a few of Spurs' goals came because they had more space due to Liverpool only having 9 players. Defoe's goal in particular came because Liverpool had less players.

you are taking things out of proportion, and you are doing it all by yourself.

Tottenham just blew Liverpool out of the water, that's the only thing people are saying.

The gareth Bale situation as you call it, would be people talking about Spurs as title contenders because they trashed Liverpool.

Did the ref unfairly take out Liverpool players? you sound as if it's unfair they were 9 v 11 and didnt deserve to be trashed. What happens after doesnt matter, game started 11 v 11, and ended 4-0. How do you know if Defoe wouldnt have score two 30m screamers to take it 5-0 with 11 men? IF scenarios... circle jerk bs my friend.

I'm not saying that Spurs didn't deserve to win. But to say that the red cards had nothing to do with the scoreline is very naive, especially when 2 of the goals came because of the numerical advantage. If Spurs had beaten a team with 11 men 4-0 then I could understand the praise. Thrashing a team when you have a 2 man advantage is not that big of an achievement.

mr-r34 wrote:

Zealous wrote:

mr-r34 wrote:The lesson learnt here today was, don't be a fool at least wait till the arsenal game was over, cause then you'll just look like a dickhead , like gil has shown.

After some time has passed it seems Gil wasn't completely wrong in his assessment.

You on the other hand could use some of your own advice LOL

Actually no, i didn't make a thread laughing at a team, based on what non liverpool fans say about them, and then watch my team perform as bad. So yeah no.

Lol i dunno who looks like the bigger ass, you or gil.

Gil, everytime you make threads like this, Chelsea usually f*ck up hours later

mr-r34 wrote:

mr-r34 wrote:

Zealous wrote:

mr-r34 wrote:The lesson learnt here today was, don't be a fool at least wait till the arsenal game was over, cause then you'll just look like a dickhead , like gil has shown.

After some time has passed it seems Gil wasn't completely wrong in his assessment.

You on the other hand could use some of your own advice LOL

Actually no, i didn't make a thread laughing at a team, based on what non liverpool fans say about them, and then watch my team perform as bad. So yeah no.

Lol i dunno who looks like the bigger twat, you or gil.

I never said Chelsea had what it took either.

As for who is a bigger ass that would be you sadly.

Now, now calm down. The childish name calling is a bit unnecessary.

He started it.

(LOL That sounds childish)

thats the third time i have edited ur post mr-r34.

Someone seems butthurt that they got schooled by Spuds

Calm down everybody...

Zealous causing trouble again I see.

liverpool would have been better had they kept miereles and aquilani...

Zealous wrote:Someone seems butthurt that they got schooled by Spuds

Sorry Rg my bad, So Zealous, did you learn anything from Gil, or levante bahahahahahahahahahahahahaha nugget and a half.

mr-r34 wrote:

Zealous wrote:Someone seems butthurt that they got schooled by Spuds

Sorry Rg my bad, So Zealous, did you learn anything from Gil, or levante bahahahahahahahahahahahahaha nugget and a half.

That was just so sad.

I haven't even read this thread.

but everything that gets thrown at us for today is justified.

It was our worst league result since April 2003 ....when Houllier lost 4-0 to Man United.

well, playing 30 min with 10 men and 30 min with 9 men didn't help...but it was just an atrocious performance from first kick off


Reminded me of Man City's performance against us at Anfield.

hopefully this will act as kick in the arse, and Gerrard will return on wednesday

at least we don't have to travel to Emirates, Britannia, and WHL anymore...3 grounds we have had the worst records at in the recent years.

Onwards and upwards....Other big teams lost this weekend too (RM, Milan, Chelsea, etc), so it makes things a tad easier to swallow

Onwards and upwards....Other big teams lost this weekend too (RM, Milan, Chelsea, etc), so it makes things a tad easier to swallow

Arsenal too... (if that makes you feel better?)

This is a LOL thread.

Liverpool will bounce back.