Re: Mou's strongest team

by leemhuis Fri 27 Apr 2012 - 15:55

huntsman wrote:
Mamad wrote:
huntsman wrote:Strongest team is Real Madrid but the most disciplined team at his disposal was inter and that's they won everything. The players were behind him 100% and the management.

We couldn't beat Bayern and we lose about 7 times in last 10 Clasico's.

this Madrid is a good team but his Chelsea and Inter were stronger. next year with few changes we can be stronger.

Madrid is much better than inter was, maybe not chelsea, but theyre better than inter for sure.

That's not the reason why inter won everything. Real Madrid is a rich-man-s club, it's a jungle out there where players, media, management backstab each other to gain more authority and power.

Look at mourinho and how much he aged in the last couple of years to understand how difficult coaching madrid is.

Any manager would fail to coach madrid pre-mourinho era. Some may succeed post mourinho era because of the changes that this great manager has made to a joke of a club called real madrid.

I have difficulty to understand how Mou's Madrid is better than Mou's Inter was. That Inter was team that gave Barcelona their biggest defeat of the passing 5 maybe 10 years. And it was a better Barcelona than today's Barcelona which Madrid has been playing and losing to. Fair is fair.

by Lord Hades Fri 27 Apr 2012 - 17:06

inter milan 2010 - what a team...

by leemhuis Fri 27 Apr 2012 - 17:45

Barrettinator wrote:If I were to make Mourinho all time XI:

Casilas
Maicon - Carvalho - Terry - Cole
Makelele - Essien
Ronaldo - Lampard
Drogba - Eto'o
Period.

Casilas
Maicon Lucio Terry Marcelo
Zanetti Essien
Sneijder
Ronaldo Eto'o/Drogba
Milito

2009 Chelsea 2010 Inter 2012 Madrid

Inter have more player because they won more.

by VanDeezNuts Fri 27 Apr 2012 - 18:18

inter was the most complete team.

so i have to choose inter, real madrid a close second though depending on who we sign and how we do next year.

by stunt Fri 27 Apr 2012 - 18:21

Inter first. Because they stepped up in the big games like no other.

Madrid second. Because talent-wise it's probabbly the best of the three.

Chelsea third. But still an amazing team on it's own right who contributed alot to the EPL's dominance back in the day.

by Blue Barrett Fri 27 Apr 2012 - 19:05

leemhuis wrote:
Barrettinator wrote:If I were to make Mourinho all time XI:

Casilas
Maicon - Carvalho - Terry - Cole
Makelele - Essien
Ronaldo - Lampard
Drogba - Eto'o
Period.

Casilas
Maicon Lucio(Carvalho's partnership with Terry was legendary) - Terry - Marcelo(Does not hold a candle to Cole at his best)
Zanetti(Makelele is a world ahead of Zanetti) - Essien
Sneijder
Ronaldo - Eto'o/Drogba(Neither of this two players play on the wong. WRONG)
Milito

2009 Chelsea 2010 Inter 2012 Madrid

Inter have more player because they won more.

by the xcx Fri 27 Apr 2012 - 19:26

Inter no doubt, but the way Mou utilized Chelsea and its depth was epic.

by goonbrain Fri 27 Apr 2012 - 20:01

Chelsea without a doubt. They destroyed some real good teams back then. They set PL records. Had the best players in their positions.

by Lord Hades Fri 27 Apr 2012 - 21:55

goonbrain wrote:Chelsea without a doubt. They destroyed some real good teams back then. They set PL records. Had the best players in their positions.

yeah but they faltered in europe tbf.. inter beat three of the best teams in europe double winners bayern munich , a superb chelsea side who romped the pl and barcelona of course

by REWB Fri 27 Apr 2012 - 21:57

mou's chelsea was way better than mou's madrid lool, people are forgetting how awesome they were as a team, they would demolish this madrid team. they had a powerful attack but they had a VERY strong defence/mid. these days the quality of the really top teams have diminished. back then the epl was at its best and barca was too. the quality was higher then, thats why mou chelsea team didnt win the cl. however, mou's inters wins it, they were really great and lethal with eto/millto in there.

mou inter
mou chelsea
..
.
.
.
mou madrid

by VanDeezNuts Fri 27 Apr 2012 - 22:31

"demolish" lol

by spanky Fri 27 Apr 2012 - 23:14

iNFINITY9910 wrote:Eto'o on his best day and Drogba in his best day is very hard to compare and come to a conclusion.

Cech was considered the best goal keeper in the world back then, Cesar is quite awesome but I believe Cech was better.

Milito doesn't even stand a chance against Robben/Duff in their prime. Thats just BS. Sneijder in his prime is not better than Lampard in his prime. Plus Makelele was a beast and he was on a higher level compared to Cambiasso. Essien was a beast back then, you cant even think to argue with that because he was a complete midfielder and none could match him on his day.

Carvalho and JT were the brickwall that no one could pass except Ronaldinho(unfortunately). Maicon I would have to agree, he is a beast.

There is a reason why Jose Mourinho's Chelsea is in the top 20 teams of the decade and no Inter Milan, in zonal marking.com

http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/01/25/teams-of-the-decade-13-chelsea-2004-06/

here is the full list of teams

http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/03/28/zonal-markings-20-teams-of-the-decade-in-full/

article written march 2010, inter won everything 2 months later

anyways i think his strongest team was inter, the team was so complete for its style of game.

by S32TABLANCA Fri 27 Apr 2012 - 23:33

Inter, Madrid are almost there though. Of course, Chelsea are more proven too. Hell, if you disregard the whole 'Barca effect', even Porto is more proven.

Real Madrid 2012-2013 will blow them all away :coffee:

by Sponsored content