Re: Lavezzi to PSG

by sportsczy Thu May 31, 2012 6:36 pm

Why don't you pull out the audited financial statements for Real Madrid (they are public and available on the official site) and the Deloitte & Touche annual football reports.... we make money organically. Our debt coverage ratio is actually high and very healthy. We could borrow a lot more and cover it easily. We run profits every year now. FFP has absolutely zero effect on us.

by Mr Nick09 Thu May 31, 2012 6:38 pm

How long until we cut our debt down to 0? i guess the renovations will make that last a bit longer

by Adit Thu May 31, 2012 6:40 pm

@ gil

Yeah i didnt forgot Berlusconi or blackburn rovers but what Chelsea did was the biggest out of all.

We are actually making profits lol.. It has been 10 years since Abramovich take over...has chelsea made a profit in any of those years? Laughing

by Dante Thu May 31, 2012 6:40 pm

Vibe wrote:Lousy excused bitches,go watch baseball

Money never featured this hard...Price inflation is beyond ridiculous now,FFP has done NOTHING.

FFP will count from 2012-2013 ,iirc . It's logical some clubs will spend huge this summer.

by Great Leader Sprucenuce Thu May 31, 2012 6:42 pm

BarrileteCosmico wrote:
Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:
Gil wrote:
Andy f*king Carroll wouldn't have been worth 35m if it wasn't for the sugardaddies.

Thats down to our expert negotiation skillz and my expert hyping skillz

I should be an agent
You would be a poor man's Zamparini.

Week 0: Simpson hires Mole as his agent.
Week 1: Mole: Simpson is amongst the best British defenders
Week 2: Mole: Simpson is the best British defender and should start for our NT, it's outrageous that he doesn't
Week 3: Mole: Newcastle should accept nothing less than 20M for his signature, Barca and Real are already interested and he's more than capable of starting for them.
Week 4: Mole: He is worth 30M
Week 5: Mole: He is worth 40M
Week 6: Mole: He is worth 50M
Week 7: Simpson is sold to PSG for 34M

LOL GOAT

although i would say he has the most goal line clearances in the Premier League as well :coffee:

by Adit Thu May 31, 2012 6:42 pm

Dante wrote:
Vibe wrote:Lousy excused bitches,go watch baseball

Money never featured this hard...Price inflation is beyond ridiculous now,FFP has done NOTHING.

FFP will count from 2012-2013 ,iirc . It's logical some clubs will spend huge this summer.

nah FFP accounts counts from 2011-12 season onwards.

Chelski,city,PSG spends because sugar daddies are allowed to absorb 45 mill euros in first two years.

by Abramovich Thu May 31, 2012 6:43 pm

If only TV rights were fair in Spain :coffee:

by Dante Thu May 31, 2012 6:45 pm

Adit wrote:
Dante wrote:
Vibe wrote:Lousy excused bitches,go watch baseball

Money never featured this hard...Price inflation is beyond ridiculous now,FFP has done NOTHING.

FFP will count from 2012-2013 ,iirc . It's logical some clubs will spend huge this summer.

nah FFP accounts counts from 2011-12 season onwards.

Chelski spends because sugar daddies are allowed to absorb 45 mill euros in first two years.

i must have perplexed something then. I thought from next season on , Sugardaddies can't intervene ; whilst now they still can . i think .

Can someone clear it up.

edit : i was -Vagi- from your edit , 2nd , nevermind.

by Adit Thu May 31, 2012 6:50 pm

Dante wrote:
Adit wrote:
Dante wrote:
Vibe wrote:Lousy excused bitches,go watch baseball

Money never featured this hard...Price inflation is beyond ridiculous now,FFP has done NOTHING.

FFP will count from 2012-2013 ,iirc . It's logical some clubs will spend huge this summer.

nah FFP accounts counts from 2011-12 season onwards.

Chelski spends because sugar daddies are allowed to absorb 45 mill euros in first two years.

i must have perplexed something then. I thought from next season on , Sugardaddies can't intervene ; whilst now they still can . i think .

Can someone clear it up.

edit : i was -Vagi- from your edit , 2nd , nevermind.

Adit wrote:Well from my understanding take couple of points.

1.FFP is on act from 2011-12 season onwards. That is current season was the first FFP season.

2.UEFA monitoring period starts from 2013-14 season in which Clubs need to submit their Accounts of both 2011-12 and 2012-13 season.

3.Those accounts have to match the break even requirement of Uefa. ie,Total relevant income should exceeds total relevant expenses.

4.All the expenses are not counted for FFP accounts. Youth development and training ,clubs social services and some exceptional charges are not counted for FFP.

5.The fee paid for sacking coaches are in exceptional charge and it doesnt count (chelsea takes notes lol),also wages of players signed before 2010 june 30 doesnt count to FFP,ever. Reason why Inter is still sticking with those oldies.

Real madrids Ronaldos and kaka's 13 and 10 million salaries will not count to FFP ever.(good one flo : ) )

6.BUT,there is an acceptable deviation in the first years of FFP.

Sugar daddy's are allowed to absorb the deviation like listed below.

2011-2013---2 year duration------Maximum of 45 million euros loss is allowed and can be absorbed by sugar daddys.

2012-2015---3 year duration---maximum of 45 mill euros loss

from then on euro 30
.......................................
ie

EUR 45 million for the monitoring period assessed in the licence seasons
2013/14 and 2014/15

EUR 30 million for the monitoring period assessed in the licence seasons
2015/16, 2016/17 and 2017/18

here is a bit i posted in other thread

by Dante Thu May 31, 2012 7:17 pm

Adit wrote:Well from my understanding take couple of points.

1.FFP is on act from 2011-12 season onwards. That is current season was the first FFP season.

2.UEFA monitoring period starts from 2013-14 season in which Clubs need to submit their Accounts of both 2011-12 and 2012-13 season.

3.Those accounts have to match the break even requirement of Uefa. ie,Total relevant income should exceeds total relevant expenses.

4.All the expenses are not counted for FFP accounts. Youth development and training ,clubs social services and some exceptional charges are not counted for FFP.

5.The fee paid for sacking coaches are in exceptional charge and it doesnt count (chelsea takes notes lol),also wages of players signed before 2010 june 30 doesnt count to FFP,ever. Reason why Inter is still sticking with those oldies.

Real madrids Ronaldos and kaka's 13 and 10 million salaries will not count to FFP ever.(good one flo : ) )

6.BUT,there is an acceptable deviation in the first years of FFP.

Sugar daddy's are allowed to absorb the deviation like listed below.

2011-2013---2 year duration------Maximum of 45 million euros loss is allowed and can be absorbed by sugar daddys.

2012-2015---3 year duration---maximum of 45 mill euros loss

from then on euro 30
.......................................
ie

EUR 45 million for the monitoring period assessed in the licence seasons
2013/14 and 2014/15

EUR 30 million for the monitoring period assessed in the licence seasons
2015/16, 2016/17 and 2017/18

ok then , xclub buys Neymar for 40m and signs him up for the youth team , it is youth development in a way , then promotes him to the 1st team.

there FFP done & dusted.

Spoiler:

by nasir6371 Thu May 31, 2012 9:07 pm

Go from Lavazzi Going to the 5th rank League in Europe at the peak of his career Into City and Chlease Destroying Football in 2 pages. Butthurt much Twisted Evil

First of all I felt it was a Bad Choice Since he did not sign with City. He could have went to Barca/Madrid/Inter where ever.

by Cotes Thu May 31, 2012 9:13 pm

The man is gonna be lost in the world like Pastore...

by nasir6371 Thu May 31, 2012 9:19 pm

Cotes wrote:The man is gonna be lost in the world like Pastore...

Honestly I can tell you i have not seen Pastore play since he left Italy. M.I.A.

by Mr Nick09 Thu May 31, 2012 9:24 pm

Cotes wrote:The man is gonna be lost in the world like Pastore...

if he is not good enough then yeah. Defenders were molesting Pastore after 3 months lol

by Mr Nick09 Thu May 31, 2012 9:57 pm

Club agreed, agent is said to be flying to Paris tomorrow.

Will sign for about 4-5M a year

by Rebaño Sagrado Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:49 am

So who the fck is gonna sign Kaka now?

Or is there still a possibility of QSG signing him?

by halamadrid2 Thu Oct 04, 2012 1:18 pm

In PSG's game against Porto Lavezzi got substitued in and then subbed out 7 mins later with no apparent injury, he was very angry judging by this clip, did anybody watch the game who could put a light on what happened??

by Ion Creanga Thu Oct 04, 2012 1:22 pm

this is what you get for leaving Napoli, the city who loved him, and where he could become a legend

by Zealous Thu Oct 04, 2012 1:33 pm

Your love gives me such a thrill... but your love don't pay my bills. :coffee:

Money don't get everything it's true... but what it don't get I can't use. :coffee:

by BarrileteCosmico Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:10 pm

He had an abductor injury and was frustrated about it...

by sportsczy Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:28 pm

mild abductor injury... he's been out for a month with it and re-tweaked it. It's the same injury as Di Maria had last year.

by Cotes Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:04 pm

Seems I was right....

by Ion Creanga Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:23 pm

Zealous wrote:Your love gives me such a thrill... but your love don't pay my bills.

Money don't get everything it's true... but what it don't get I can't use.

yeah, I agree but he had a very good wage at napoli too... what's the point in moving from 3 milions per year to 5 per year, and become a bitch?..

He was the most popular figure at napoli, considered the new Maradona... I'm sure he didn't miss anything at napoli, Mafioso owner De Laurentiis would get him any bitches he wants without his wife knowledge..

But no, Napoli is a dangerous city, and I want Paris because it's beautiful and good for my wife and kids, and i can settle here in peace...or some shi.t stuff like that Shocked

by halamadrid2 Thu Oct 04, 2012 6:19 pm

wow an injured player getting worked up like that, he didn't get medical attention tho, maybe Ancelotti was just being cautious

Even Ibra did not know what the hell happened neither did the commentators but if he did have an injury he did not show that, although Carlo did "confirm" he was taken out for an injury

by Sponsored content