UCL: Malmo vs Juventus

salmano9 wrote:

DeviAngel wrote:Vidal playing good

the guy was passing to the corner flag in attack ffs ..

God. Vidal was our pooresr alongside padoin. Didn't see anything from him. Very very disappointing

Padoin did nothing special. Lol

well he shut their left side, and had 100% pass ratio from 38 passes and there were not all 3 meter passes. Sorry he did good, and offered a lot more than Asa and Evra can on LB

Asa and Evra are very average at LB. I prefer someone like Padoin who just works on his role of securing the Left so Pogba can raid forward!

DeviAngel wrote:Vidal playing good

the guy was passing to the corner flag in attack ffs ..

I disagree, that was one play. He seemed better than a few games ago in my opinion and he seemed to work very hard. He was passing well, was composed, tackled well, tracked back every now and then and in my opinion just played a good game in general. Maybe he could've taken a few more shots but he still played good. I don't think he's on top form yet, and to be honest I don't know if we should keep playing him in CAM. I mean he still plays good there, but he might be better in CM. We'll see though, I hope he starts and scores vs Torino.

A win in typical Sexxxlegri fashion, making it harder than it should for a team.

Llorente's goal was a beauty as one must admire his calculated run back and then the burst to fool the defence followed by the superb composure to round the keeper and slot it in with his left. LOL is generally immobile without the ball yet normally looks far faster and more swift on it than without. He's done many of these goals in Athletic.

5 goals in the last 6 games tells me a certain morbidly oobese churling clodhopper of this section should be eating grass as we speak.

And I am a non believer of the Baraja. *bleep* this goat since Mehlm will only show up to unleash Baraja vs Cesena and Cremonese than Roma or Athletic

My own 600 pound brother whom I personally killed after a 'shine deal went south could score a brace against Parma and inflate his tally.

DeviAngel wrote:

salmano9 wrote:

DeviAngel wrote:Vidal playing good

the guy was passing to the corner flag in attack ffs ..

God. Vidal was our pooresr alongside padoin. Didn't see anything from him. Very very disappointing

Padoin did nothing special. Lol

well he shut their left side, and had 100% pass ratio from 38 passes and there were not all 3 meter passes. Sorry he did good, and offered a lot more than Asa and Evra can on LB

Lol, we attacked most of time and padwin did't seem to be a threat as much as Licht (who we kinda depended on him too in a 4312). I didn't see much from him tbh...

As for vidal, I will judge him more against El toro if he plays... I wanna see pereyra though...

DeviAngel wrote:

‚ Тhe video from Allegri being angry yesterday,

and the gif

http://giant.gfycat.com/EssentialAgileBlackpanther.gif

Was this after Morata hit the crossbar? LOL

Arquitescu wrote:A win in typical Sexxxlegri fashion, making it harder than it should for a team.

Llorente's goal was a beauty as one must admire his calculated run back and then the burst to fool the defence followed by the superb composure to round the keeper and slot it in with his left. LOL is generally immobile without the ball yet normally looks far faster and more swift on it than without. He's done many of these goals in Athletic.

5 goals in the last 6 games tells me a certain morbidly oobese churling clodhopper of this section should be eating grass as we speak.

And I am a non believer of the Baraja. *bleep* this goat since Mehlm will only show up to unleash Baraja vs Cesena and Cremonese than Roma or Athletic

haters can hate, but the Great One never fails, he shall prove his worth to unbelievers when we face Atletico Madrid

#BarajaForPresident