Falcao and Hulk

kick mars wrote:Blue, you can't use those two as examples, neither of them have moved.

My point is that both players want a move, but publicly they state they are happy with their current club. It is about professionalism and that is waht Falcao, Modric, and Csec are doing.

I agree, I was just saying if you think he's going to move you can't use examples of players who haven't moved. I'm still unsure if he will move or not.

kick mars wrote:I agree, I was just saying if you think he's going to move you can't use examples of players who haven't moved. I'm still unsure if he will move or not.

I don't know either, Because i am not sure how interested is Chelsea in Falcao. But i am pretty sure he would move to Stamford Bridge if Chelsea came calling.

Boas has been on the job for a few days, i don't think he has decided on a list of preferred players yet.

yeah, If I were him I'd be spending all my time watching videos of our proformences last season. then go player by player and pick who I want in my team.

in my spare time I'd work at bringing the staff I want. then once 7th of July hits, I'd make final decisions on who is staying and going.

theaguia wrote:falcao has just said i am happy in porto, maybe he isnt coming after all

yeah thats the fail-safe quote. Just in case no move happens..

wouldn't surprise me if he doesn't move.

kick mars wrote:wouldn't surprise me if he doesn't move.

I wouldnt be surprised if he does move as well, although it would be pretty pointless tbh.

It would be, almost as pointless as bringing in a new CB or another box-to-box mid.

20m for Lukaku is a waste

I hope we sign him to prove you wrong blue.

He will be a flop at Chelsea, so i hope we don't sign him.

lol.

I said on the old forums, this summer has been the first time us Chelsea fans have disagreed on something. That statement still stands.

Cant really say Lukaku would flop, just like that . But he is a pretty expensive buy nevertheless...

Not expensive if he stays for the next decade and brings 15+ goals every season.

Isn't too early to think about a replacement for Torres?

in 4-5 years maybe Lalkovič or someone else from the academy could emerge. A another option would be play Sturridge when Torres slows down, i am sure he would rather play CF then on the wing.

Falcao on the hand will contribute from day one and be immense for us.

If Lukaku costed the club 10-12m, then i would've been in favor of him but 20m is ridicules for a player down the road.

Lukaku= Kalou 2.0

lukaku is way to expensive for a plyer on his last year, imo ozil was 15mil and he was class. lukaku has still alot to prove i wouldnt pay more then 15 mil for him even though #he is great

Ozil was 15 mil because he only had 12 months left on his contract.. if he had 4 years he woulda cost alot more. I'd pay 15-20 for lukaku but chelsea isn't a good destination for him.

theaguia wrote:lukaku is way to expensive for a plyer on his last year, imo ozil was 15mil and he was class. lukaku has still alot to prove i wouldnt pay more then 15 mil for him even though #he is great

Good point!

He should stay at Belgium for another year, then he should pick which club he wants to play for next year.

FilipeFerreira wrote:Ozil was 15 mil because he only had 12 months left on his contract.. if he had 4 years he woulda cost alot more. I'd pay 15-20 for lukaku but chelsea isn't a good destination for him.

Same thing with Lukaku, he will be a free agent in 12 months.

well they said he is leaving this year for sure

The thing is, we cant really be sure if he bangs in 15+ or if he would to a Kalou all over as Blue just said...

FilipeFerreira wrote:Ozil was 15 mil because he only had 12 months left on his contract.. if he had 4 years he woulda cost alot more. I'd pay 15-20 for lukaku but chelsea isn't a good destination for him.

lukaku only has one year left on his contract

The young austrian prosneik is supposed to be a good striker...

Who says we can't revert back to a diamond mid formation in the future? Lukaku Sturridge up front with Piazon behind them.

Diamond is not a very preferred formation among young managers if im correct.

doesn't matter.

If you're players suit it you should play it IMO.

Our players suit it? OK in about 5-6 years its a different story.