Teixera banned from officiating Madrid

This is so pointless.

Hala why do you even bother responding to Jiopsi?

:lol!:

halamadrid2 wrote:

che wrote:

halamadrid2 wrote:because of some funny rather humours comments some of you have made like the legendary 4 right next to 7

are you retarded?

again where is 4 right next to 7

how high is your IQ???

On the right number-pad, 7 is just above 4.....

Crimson wrote:
On the right number-pad, 7 is just above 4.....

is that right NEXT TO????

-------> next to


/\
I
I
I
I

on top of

there is 45th minute and even 46th legal minute. why to write 44 when you can easily write 46. even writing 47 is normal. anyway let it be a lie its your opinion

About referees and madrid i would say this

Mourinho getting hate is - normal
Madrid getting hate is - normal
Pepe getting hate is - normal
Pepe getting yellow is - normal
Lass getting yellow is - normal
Ramos getting yellow is - normal
Not showing a red to pepe is - abnormal

Now what you expect from referees? they even you see madrid players as animals and most people here think they are animals. only player can be considered as an animal in barca squad is pinto. there are divers but theres no animal in barca squad. So after getting famous as a Zoo club getting yellows, reds is normal. after those stamps, kicks, punches an easy contact is enough to get carded

if i was referee i would stop the game everytime pepe or ramos gets the ball. because i would be in worry that they would do something to the ball

Theres no bias in referees. Theres a worry and hate. And all are your own faults (mainly because of mourinho)

halamadrid2 wrote:

Crimson wrote:

halamadrid2 wrote:

che wrote:

halamadrid2 wrote:because of some funny rather humours comments some of you have made like the legendary 4 right next to 7

are you retarded?

again where is 4 right next to 7

how high is your IQ???

On the right number-pad, 7 is just above 4.....

is that right NEXT TO????

Next: nearest or adjacent in place or position

.....

Crimson wrote:

Next: nearest or adjacent in place or position

.....

another word for adjacent for people to understand

halamadrid2 wrote:

Crimson wrote:

Next: nearest or adjacent in place or position

.....

another word for adjacent for people to understand

nearest is also applicable to next

it does not have to mean (although it can) following in succession

seriously are you that stupid?

Crimson wrote:
nearest is also applicable to next

it does not have to mean (although it can) following in succession

seriously are you that stupid?

so do you say next to when something is on top of something??? really??

follow in succession ----> doesnt mean <---------

seriously tho, go and keep calling next to, on top of or vice versa lol

halamadrid2 wrote:

Crimson wrote:
nearest is also applicable to next

it does not have to mean (although it can) following in succession

seriously are you that stupid?

so do you say next to when something is on top of something??? really??

follow in succession ----> doesnt mean <---------

seriously tho, go and keep calling next to, on top of lol

I'm stating fact go look it up....

Your simply stating opinion

Seriously grow a brain, I heard it helps

Crimson wrote:
I'm stating fact go look it up....

Your simply stating opinion

Seriously grow a brain, I heard it helps

flawed fact.... all you've given me is that it doesnt need to be in succession... and we all know that since backward isnt in succesion

but oh well.... some of you dont know things like that it seems

halamadrid2 wrote:

Crimson wrote:

halamadrid2 wrote:

Crimson wrote:
nearest is also applicable to next

it does not have to mean (although it can) following in succession

seriously are you that stupid?

so do you say next to when something is on top of something??? really??

follow in succession ----> doesnt mean <---------

seriously tho, go and keep calling next to, on top of lol

I'm stating fact go look it up....

Your simply stating opinion

Seriously grow a brain, I heard it helps

flawed fact.... all you've given me is that it doesnt need to be in succession... and we all know that since backward isnt in succesion

but oh well.... some of you dont know things like that it seems

You got owned stop trying to get out of it by making yourself look smart (when actually your doing the opposite)

When describing something you can and it is commonly accepted to say right next to that xxxx other there or that xxxx was right next to that xxxx, whether it be in, on top of, or below.

Does it sound better to be more descriptive, possibly, depending on the country you come from and whether or not English is your second language or not.

Is it defined law, no....

You should try learning English, I have a book I can recommend lol

Crimson wrote:
You got owned stop trying to get out of it by making yourself look smart (when actually your doing the opposite)

When describing something you can and it is commonly accepted to say right next to that xxxx other there or that xxxx was right next to that xxxx, whether it be in, on top of, or below.

Does it sound better to be more descriptive, possibly, depending on the country you come from and whether or not English is your second language or not.

Is it defined law, no....

You should try learning English, I have a book I can recommend lol

i mean do you really see people describing something on top of as right next to??? really??

law or not its never used... and it isn't for a reason

good for you... go keep describing something that just above as right next to.. whatever floats your boat i guess

someone stop this kindergarten discussions

halamadrid2 wrote:

Crimson wrote:
You got owned stop trying to get out of it by making yourself look smart (when actually your doing the opposite)

When describing something you can and it is commonly accepted to say right next to that xxxx other there or that xxxx was right next to that xxxx, whether it be in, on top of, or below.

Does it sound better to be more descriptive, possibly, depending on the country you come from and whether or not English is your second language or not.

Is it defined law, no....

You should try learning English, I have a book I can recommend lol

i mean do you really see people describing something on top of as right next to??? really??

law or not its never used... and it isn't for a reason

good for you... go keep describing something that just above as right next to.. whatever floats your boat i guess

Want a tissue?

Or maybe I can send you a dictionary for your birthday?

Crimson wrote:
Want a tissue?

Or maybe I can send you a dictionary for your birthday?

what you gave me was a definition of next...

next: Nearest in space or position; adjacent

next to: immediately following or adjacent to

nah keep the dictionary for yourself... you'd need it

How all of this has any relevance...............I have no idea...........but :lucas:

halamadrid2 wrote:
i mean do you really see people describing something on top of as right next to??? really??

law or not its never used... and it isn't for a reason

good for you... go keep describing something that just above as right next to.. whatever floats your boat i guess

In a 10 storey building, what floor is next to the Ground level..

Jack Daniels wrote:

halamadrid2 wrote:
i mean do you really see people describing something on top of as right next to??? really??

law or not its never used... and it isn't for a reason

good for you... go keep describing something that just above as right next to.. whatever floats your boat i guess

In a 10 storey building, what floor is next to the Ground level..

nopp didnt make any sense... you cant even say that

halamadrid2 wrote:

nopp didnt make any sense... you cant even say that

Do i really need to explain that the question was about climbing levels?

Thought that was obvious.

I give up.. Here, you win.

halamadrid2 wrote:

Jack Daniels wrote:

halamadrid2 wrote:
i mean do you really see people describing something on top of as right next to??? really??

law or not its never used... and it isn't for a reason

good for you... go keep describing something that just above as right next to.. whatever floats your boat i guess

In a 10 storey building, what floor is next to the Ground level..

nopp didnt make any sense... you cant even say that

English

Etymology
Old English nīehst (“nearest, next”), superlative form of nēah (“nigh, near”)

Pronunciation
enPR: nĕkst, IPA: /nɛkst/, SAMPA: /nEkst/
Audio (US)
(file)
Rhymes: -ɛkst

Adjective

next (not comparable)

Following in a sequence.
Being closer to the present location than all other items.
Nearest following (of date, time, space or order).

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/next

Read number 2 for me it's next to number 1.

Jack Daniels wrote:

halamadrid2 wrote:

nopp didnt make any sense... you cant even say that

Do i really need to explain that the question was about climbing levels?

Thought that was obvious.

I give up.. Here, you win.

i know you meant climbing up... but you cant say that... 6th floor next to the 7th floor??? uh oh

Crimson wrote:


next (not comparable)

Following in a sequence.
Being closer to the present location than all other items.
Nearest following (of date, time, space or order).

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/next

Read number 2 for me it's next to number 1.

you cant read??... you are still giving me next

i gave you the definition of NEXT TO and you keep giving me the definition of next

EDIT:here you go:

Preposition

next to
Beside; alongside.
Do you mind if I sit next to you?

Immediately following or preceding in a sequence; just subsequent or previous.

When you start the next to the last roll, get some more paper.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/next_to

halamadrid2 wrote:

Crimson wrote:
English

Etymology
Old English nīehst (“nearest, next”), superlative form of nēah (“nigh, near”)

Pronunciation
enPR: nĕkst, IPA: /nɛkst/, SAMPA: /nEkst/
Audio (US)
(file)
Rhymes: -ɛkst

Adjective

next (not comparable)

Following in a sequence.
Being closer to the present location than all other items.
Nearest following (of date, time, space or order).

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/next

Read number 2 for me it's next to number 1.

you cant read??... you are still giving me next

i gave you the definition of NEXT TO and you keep giving me the definition of next

I can't compete with this level of stupidity

Come back in four to five weeks when it actually sinks in what I have told you lmao

:lucas:

@halamadrid2
In this music staff, what note is next to the key of "E"?



/End Convo