Stoke 6-1 Liverpool

Hapless_Hans wrote:so why didn't Sterling play?

Absolutely invisible today. Result can be his fault too. Rodgers is innocent. He can't compete with United, Chelsea, Arsenal and City financially or something something.

"I thought we were excellent. We didn't get the win, but our overall game was outstanding," he said.

"I don't think there is anyone better, that is the reality of how I see it."

"Three months ago I was a tactical genius."

“Southampton don’t have to sell, they have a choice. Maybe their objectives have changed. They were looking to be a Champions League club, I believe.”

“Look at Tottenham … [when] you spend over £100m you’d expect to be challenging for the league.”

Any more off topic posts in this thread will result in a loss of 25%.

urbaNRoots wrote:

Natalie Portman wrote:

chad4401 wrote:watching pool still being mediocre still gives me great joy , especially after all the crap their fans talked earlier in the season, from topping a group with madrid in it, to not even making it out the group at all, and now this

Says the Real Madrid fan from Jamaica

Can you even spot Madrid on the map, yet alone actually maybe go to a game ?

+1

-25% for refusing to listen to moderators warnings on thread derailment - Kick

+1? could be +1000, i say what i want when i want, and i don't need to see pool live to know their crap, you think your better than other posters? because you can go to games?

-25% for refusing to listen to moderators warnings on thread derailment - Kick

Sakho needs to go. Completely and utterly out of his depth playing for a team looking to top the summit of the Premier League. Mignolet is also a liability nowadays.

Lex wrote:Sakho needs to go. Completely and utterly out of his depth playing for a team looking to top the summit of the Premier League. Mignolet is also a liability nowadays.

You need to watch football properly.

Sakho is comfortably our best defender and our win ratio with him playing is TWICE as much without him, same with our goals conceded with him as without.
Not to mention 90% passing accuracy, highest number of clearances and interceptions in the team.
If anyone looks at our defense and thinks Sakho is the problem, then they perhaps should go and follow Darts, because footy is too complicated of a game for them.

This was his first game back after 6 weeks of injury and the whole team was shambles with no confidence, and still most goals were fault of fullbacks and not him,.

But then again, you're the same biased person who thinks LAURENT BOSSCIELNY IS DA BEST CB EVAAA !!
Despite the fact that he gives away 1 penalty every 3 games (You see, I can play the game of BS myth stereotypes against rival players' as well)

No, no, Sakho is pure dog kak. Watch his game vs us and watch him again yesterday, flopping about against the might of Peter Crouch and Charlie Adam

And, with respect, Koscielny is eons better than Sakho, that is not even up for debate.

^ amazing. That our France managers think differently. Because they don't see the game through the GreekSenal tinted glasses as you do. You know *bleep* all. You're just a forum clown. Those are proper managers. I know who's opinion has more weight

Ps. I said that yesterday, that it could be a Panucci-Nesta-Cannavaro-Maldini in a Rodgers 4 men defends and it'd look leaky. Because according to reports he spends Minimal to no time to defending at training .

I lol'd @ Greeksenal

tbh. I thought this thread would be full of trolling. anyway. poor showing from the mighty reds.