leave arsenal alone

Lex wrote:Says the fan of a club which s nothing more than billionaires rattle

You bash our owner every single damn time but if you had half a brain you would know you desperately need an owner who's willing to spend the cash. Because right now you have people controlling your club who merely care about the amount of shares they have, which is shown by their lack of contribution to the club. That's even what you guys say when people bash Wenger.

Lex wrote:

kick mars wrote:if this had happened to us Arsenal would be insulting us as much as possible

You really see me (or any Arsenal fan on here for that matter) going from thread to thread and posting insults about Chelsea? Perhaps evening starting multiple threads mocking them?

No sir, I have never seen you bash Chelsea in multiple threads

izzy26 wrote:

kick mars wrote:Question?

Is Torres a horrible player?

You can bash any of our players for all I care. The fact is arsenal were demolished today and while we can take bashings these arsenal fans can't.

What are these bashings that Chelsea took?

Name some threads if you can remember some because I really can't.

So throughout your time here you have never, I repeat never, seen a thread bashing Chelsea? Ok then, that's pretty believable.

settle down arsenal fans hes nly bashing your GK, not the club!

What utter tosh. De Gea walks in and, suddenly, Szczesny becomes the worst of the top four goalkeepers

Still waiting on one of those trillions of threads bashing Chelsea by the way. You having trouble choosing one from the eclectic selection you have?

Yes.

2>8

mate.

Oh wait, I forogt all good goal keepers concede 8 goals a game.

I know its one game but you gotta ask yourself, if you had a world class goalie would things be different.

And conceding 8 goals is all Szczesny's fault and has NOTHING to do with the shambles of a back four that was in front of him?

lex settle down, hes not bashing your club!

english_jewel wrote:No sir, I have never seen you bash Chelsea in multiple threads

I dish it out only when i have it served up

english_jewel wrote:So throughout your time here you have never, I repeat never, seen a thread bashing Chelsea? Ok then, that's pretty believable.

Oh, let me get this straight.

There are TWO threads on this entire board that bash Chelsea. One started by a Madrid fan the other by a United fan.
And who are YOU to complain? I clearly remember on the goal.com forums how you were running your mouth in the Arsenal section about how comfortabley Chelsea were going to destroy Arsenal. Only for Arsenal to crush Chelsea 3-1 and for you to go into hiding.

@fatman, are we not discussing the GK and not club?

I didn't say that.

A goal keeper is only as good as the defence infront of him but the same can be said about the defence. Chelsea wouldn't have conceded today if we had Cech in goal. You see what I'm saying?

WC GK means the defence panic less and are better because of it.

fatman123 wrote:lex settle down, hes not bashing your club!

This would be funny if anyone had stated such

To be honest, i though Sczezny's positioning on all the free kicks was very bad!

kick mars wrote:Chelsea wouldn't have conceded today if we had Cech in goal. You see what I'm saying?

You really believe that? You think that if Chelsea had Chech in goal, a RB playing at LB, a player making his league debut at RB and two second choice CB's, as well as a makeshift midfield of youngsters with no league experience and more second choice players, you would keep the score down to a respectable number?

Lex wrote:Says the fan of a club which s nothing more than billionaires rattle

On a completely unrelated note, my grammar sucks first thing in the morning

Lex wrote:

kick mars wrote:Chelsea wouldn't have conceded today if we had Cech in goal. You see what I'm saying?

You really believe that? You think that if Chelsea had Chech in goal, a RB playing at LB, a player making his league debut at RB and two second choice CB's, as well as a makeshift midfield of youngsters with no league experience and more second choice players, you would keep the score down to a respectable number?

In our game I mean, Ivanovic and hilario had a mix up which cost us a goal. If Cech had been playing there wouldn't have been a mix up as Ivanovic trusts Cech to do the right thing.

I use to play CB and when I had a good GK behind me I knew we were safer then when I had a bad GK. When I felt safer I played better.

Same for arsenal IMO.

Lex wrote:

fatman123 wrote:lex settle down, hes not bashing your club!

This would be funny if anyone had stated such

hes not bashing your club, hes just bahing you GK

Lex wrote:

kick mars wrote:Chelsea wouldn't have conceded today if we had Cech in goal. You see what I'm saying?

You really believe that? You think that if Chelsea had Chech in goal, a RB playing at LB, a player making his league debut at RB and two second choice CB's, as well as a makeshift midfield of youngsters with no league experience and more second choice players, you would keep the score down to a respectable number?

thats the difference between chelsea and arsenal, we understand that when we loose key players we have to replace them, we also understand that you need to have adequate squad depth so when you do have an extensive injury/suspension list come mid season, or if your arsenal 3 games into the season, that you arent forced to rely on such a shambles of an XI in the most difficult game you will play all season, vs united at OT
clearly Arsene Wenger doesnt understand this, even when the cash is there to be spent and a situation which desprately needs some cash to be splashed

Right, so Chelsea have enough squad depth to adequately replace thirteen first team and back-up players and still survive a meeting with United at OT?

izzy26 wrote:

english_jewel wrote:So throughout your time here you have never, I repeat never, seen a thread bashing Chelsea? Ok then, that's pretty believable.

Oh, let me get this straight.

There are TWO threads on this entire board that bash Chelsea. One started by a Madrid fan the other by a United fan.
And who are YOU to complain? I clearly remember on the goal.com forums how you were running your mouth in the Arsenal section about how comfortabley Chelsea were going to destroy Arsenal. Only for Arsenal to crush Chelsea 3-1 and for you to go into hiding.

@fatman, are we not discussing the GK and not club?

I go into hiding? How about that time when I said that thing about Nigeria and you get all insulted and say that I'm not so intelligent blah blah, but then when I back it up with things I have seen you ignore that comment and "go into hiding"?

Plus thank you for admitting that there have been threads bashing Chelsea, after you claimed there weren't any. Next time just do a bit of research first before you claim something.

Lex wrote:

english_jewel wrote:No sir, I have never seen you bash Chelsea in multiple threads

I dish it out only when i have it served up

So in other words you do bash. Plus I see you didn't bother to reply to that owner comment, I suppose I was right?

Lex wrote:Right, so Chelsea have enough squad depth to adequately replace thirteen first team and back-up players and still survive a meeting with United at OT?

m

bertrand ftw

Lex wrote:Right, so Chelsea have enough squad depth to adequately replace thirteen first team and back-up players and still survive a meeting with United at OT?

No, but at the same token we don't have a joke medical team.

David Seaman once conceded 6 goals...Cech hasn't...Cech > Seaman ?

isnt arsenal like the only epl club which regularly makes profits.. and doesnt it actually benefit despite ffp.. all those fees received from selling players.. surely wenger can spend at least something.. when freaking bankrupt teams like valencia are making such good signings like adil rami do arsenal really have to rely on traore and co?

Lex wrote:Right, so Chelsea have enough squad depth to adequately replace thirteen first team and back-up players and still survive a meeting with United at OT?

if by survive you mean cinceed less then 8 goals, then im gonna say yes\
is all seriousness though who are the 13 unavilables cause i thought it was 8, and you cant be counting fab and nasri, aresene knew they were going and has had ample time to replace them if he wanted to

Lex wrote:Right, so Chelsea have enough squad depth to adequately replace thirteen first team and back-up players and still survive a meeting with United at OT?

He means when you lose a player to another club.

Carvalho > Luiz
Ballack > ramires
deco > Benayoun
zhirkov > Mata

For arsenal
fabregas >????
Nasri > that third division winger.
Clichey > uhhhhhh? Gibbs.

You see, we replace players, you don't.

Plus, your squad is made of glass, ours isn't.

english_jewel wrote:Plus thank you for admitting that there have been threads bashing Chelsea, after you claimed there weren't any

No he didn't

english_jewel wrote:So in other words you do bash

Only when someone talks smack first. I don't do what you do and run to multiple threads chucking out insults left and right

english_jewel wrote:Plus I see you didn't bother to reply to that owner comment, I suppose I was right?

To be honest, i skimmed over that part. I shall go back and re-read it properly

kick mars wrote:

Lex wrote:Right, so Chelsea have enough squad depth to adequately replace thirteen first team and back-up players and still survive a meeting with United at OT?

He means when you lose a player to another club.

Carvalho > Luiz
Ballack > ramires
deco > Benayoun
zhirkov > Mata

For arsenal
fabregas >????
Nasri > that third division winger.
Clichey > uhhhhhh? Gibbs.

You see, we replace players, you don't.

Plus, your squad is made of glass, ours isn't.

Nasri > Gervinho

english_jewel wrote:

Lex wrote:Right, so Chelsea have enough squad depth to adequately replace thirteen first team and back-up players and still survive a meeting with United at OT?

No

I'm glad we cleared that up