Re: leave arsenal alone

by Lex Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:31 am

english_jewel wrote:
Lex wrote:Right, so Chelsea have enough squad depth to adequately replace thirteen first team and back-up players and still survive a meeting with United at OT?

No

I'm glad we cleared that up

by fatman123 Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:31 am

izzy26 wrote: @fatman, are we not discussing the GK and not club?

tbh i agree with you 100%, but you see Zealous, a fellow gooner of yours doesnt, so im just following his logic
so if you cna bash torres without bashing chelsea then im gonna bash you Gk without bashing you club :coffee:

Zealous wrote:The Torres bashing was purely directed at Torres though. No one said anything about Chelsea during that whole thing.

by El Chelsea Fuerte Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:34 am

Lex wrote:
english_jewel wrote:Plus thank you for admitting that there have been threads bashing Chelsea, after you claimed there weren't any
No he didn't

"What are these bashings that Chelsea took?

Name some threads if you can remember some because I really can't."

by Kick Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:34 am

ali8775 wrote:
kick mars wrote:
Lex wrote:Right, so Chelsea have enough squad depth to adequately replace thirteen first team and back-up players and still survive a meeting with United at OT?
He means when you lose a player to another club.

Carvalho > Luiz
Ballack > ramires
deco > Benayoun
zhirkov > Mata

For arsenal
fabregas >????
Nasri > that third division winger.
Clichey > uhhhhhh? Gibbs.

You see, we replace players, you don't.

Plus, your squad is made of glass, ours isn't.

Nasri > Gervinho

Eboue > no one.
Wouod you like me to go on?

by izzy Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:35 am

english_jewel wrote:I go into hiding? How about that time when I said that thing about Nigeria and you get all insulted and say that I'm not so intelligent blah blah, but then when I back it up with things I have seen you ignore that comment and "go into hiding"?

Plus thank you for admitting that there have been threads bashing Chelsea, after you claimed there weren't any. Next time just do a bit of research first before you claim something.

So in other words you do bash. Plus I see you didn't bother to reply to that owner comment, I suppose I was right?

Brilliant, now why don't you read over the thread and show me the Arsenal fans ripping on Chelsea? Come on.
Both threads started by Madrid and United fan. Chelsea fans were going into a fit moaning and crying about how this is revenge for Gunners making fun of them when nothing of the sort happened.

I'm still waiting on these threads that Gunners fans have made bashing Chelsea.

by Lex Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:35 am

kick mars wrote:Carvalho > Luiz
Ballack > ramires
deco > Benayoun
zhirkov > Mata

So why can you say you replaced Ballack with Ramires and Deco with Benayoun and it's perfectly acceptable, but it's ludicrous to think that Wilshere and Ramsey can replace Nasri and Fabregas?

Anyway, Gervinho was brought in to replace Nasri

by Lex Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:37 am

english_jewel wrote:"What are these bashings that Chelsea took?

Name some threads if you can remember some because I really can't."

And that's him admitting that there aren't any threads, is it?

by Kick Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:37 am

Because neither of them are close to the level of fabregas. Benayoun and Ramires are closer to the level of the players they replaced.

by Lex Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:38 am

So you honestly think Ramires and Benayoun are on the same level as Ballack and Deco?

confused

by izzy Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:39 am

english_jewel wrote:
Lex wrote:
english_jewel wrote:Plus thank you for admitting that there have been threads bashing Chelsea, after you claimed there weren't any
No he didn't

"What are these bashings that Chelsea took?

Name some threads if you can remember some because I really can't."

Maybe I should of been more clear, just for you.

Name me these threads made by Gunners fans bashing Chlesea?
Simples.

I'll give you a hint, the thread starters are both hardened Gunners fans. Rolling Eyes

by Kick Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:39 am

Where did I say that lex?

Come back when you can read mate.

by Lex Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:40 am

Ok ok Mr Pedantic Rolling Eyes

so you think they're close to the level of Ballack and Deco?

by fatman123 Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:42 am

still waiting for the list of thirteen unavailable players.....

by Kick Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:43 am

No, I said closer than what Jack and aaron are.

Granded cesc is better than ballack and deco but Ramires and Benayoun are closer to Ballacks and decos level than Jack and aaron are to cesc's.

by Lex Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:45 am

kick mars wrote:No, I said closer than what Jack and aaron are

no you didn't

kick mars wrote:Granded cesc is better than ballack and deco but Ramires and Benayoun are closer to Ballacks and decos level than Jack and aaron are to cesc's.

As for Nasri?

by El Chelsea Fuerte Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:45 am

izzy26 wrote:
english_jewel wrote:I go into hiding? How about that time when I said that thing about Nigeria and you get all insulted and say that I'm not so intelligent blah blah, but then when I back it up with things I have seen you ignore that comment and "go into hiding"?

Plus thank you for admitting that there have been threads bashing Chelsea, after you claimed there weren't any. Next time just do a bit of research first before you claim something.

So in other words you do bash. Plus I see you didn't bother to reply to that owner comment, I suppose I was right?
Brilliant, now why don't you read over the thread and show me the Arsenal fans ripping on Chelsea? Come on.
Both threads started by Madrid and United fan. Chelsea fans were going into a fit moaning and crying about how this is revenge for Gunners making fun of them when nothing of the sort happened.

I'm still waiting on these threads that Gunners fans have made bashing Chelsea.

You're saying that Arsenal fans never make fun of Chelsea be it in a thread they created or a comment they posted?

And if there is some sort of "revenge" it's only that Arsenal fans have been saying since Roman came that he'll leave in a few years and we'll have no one to pay our bills and then we'll be back to midtable blah blah, only to see what is happening to them now. Laughing

by Lex Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:46 am

Did Ramires really cost 19.5 million??

by Ali Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:47 am

kick mars wrote:
ali8775 wrote:
kick mars wrote:
Lex wrote:Right, so Chelsea have enough squad depth to adequately replace thirteen first team and back-up players and still survive a meeting with United at OT?
He means when you lose a player to another club.

Carvalho > Luiz
Ballack > ramires
deco > Benayoun
zhirkov > Mata

For arsenal
fabregas >????
Nasri > that third division winger.
Clichey > uhhhhhh? Gibbs.

You see, we replace players, you don't.

Plus, your squad is made of glass, ours isn't.

Nasri > Gervinho

Eboue > no one.
Wouod you like me to go on?

Eboue > Jenkinson , and he's performed admirably so far

by El Chelsea Fuerte Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:49 am

Lex wrote:Did Ramires really cost 19.5 million??

Are you questioning his worth on the pitch? Didn't you see the game against Norwich?

Oh wait I forgot Ramsey is better than Ramires. Laughing

by Kick Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:49 am

kick mars wrote:Because neither of them are close to the level of fabregas. Benayoun and Ramires are closer to the level of the players they replaced.

I'm not quite you're you understand this Lex, take a careful read of it.

as for Gervinho, he's the only good thing you have done all summer. Too bad he went and got sent off.

by izzy Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:50 am

english_jewel wrote:You're saying that Arsenal fans never make fun of Chelsea be it in a thread they created or a comment they posted?

And if there is some sort of "revenge" it's only that Arsenal fans have been saying since Roman came that he'll leave in a few years and we'll have no one to pay our bills and then we'll be back to midtable blah blah, only to see what is happening to them now.

Nice way to try and flip it. You were complaining that there were threads made by Arsenal fans bashing Chelsea, not that they make comments in others threads taking snipes at Chelsea.

TBH, the last paragraph, I've pretty much heard everybody say that about Chlesea, including City as well tbf.

by fatman123 Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:51 am

Lex wrote:Did Ramires really cost 19.5 million??

and he was worht every penny of that sum too

and whats the go Lex, youve gone cold on me here, im still waiting to see the attendence list on arsenals hospital
or did you loose your list of all thirteen unavailable players?

by Kick Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:51 am

ali8775 wrote:
kick mars wrote:
ali8775 wrote:
kick mars wrote:
Lex wrote:Right, so Chelsea have enough squad depth to adequately replace thirteen first team and back-up players and still survive a meeting with United at OT?
He means when you lose a player to another club.

Carvalho > Luiz
Ballack > ramires
deco > Benayoun
zhirkov > Mata

For arsenal
fabregas >????
Nasri > that third division winger.
Clichey > uhhhhhh? Gibbs.

You see, we replace players, you don't.

Plus, your squad is made of glass, ours isn't.

Nasri > Gervinho

Eboue > no one.
Wouod you like me to go on?

Eboue > Jenkinson , and he's performed admirably so far

Oh yes, he's already scored for you guys. Amazing player, great replacement.

If you were fighting a relegation battle...oh wait.

by Lex Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:52 am

english_jewel wrote:Are you questioning his worth on the pitch? Didn't you see the game against Norwich?

Oh wait I forgot Ramsey is better than Ramires.

And all i did was ask a question lol

by Ali Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:53 am

are you daft? aren't you the SAME person saying Eboue attacks too much, hes worthless, he dives , whatever

hes a fantastic back up

by Lex Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:53 am

kick mars wrote:I'm not quite you're you understand this Lex, take a careful read of it

Fair enough, so you did say it

by Sponsored content