Should Madrid opt for Hazard??

Let's face it, Madrid lost the CDR because of Di Maria, they lost the CL because of Di Maria, and they were just a hair from losing La Liga because of Di Maria, so here comes the questions, should they purchase hazard?

Will hazard make any diffrence on the right flank??

He has an average speed when compared to wingers but a good control on the ball. I find him a big improvement over Di MAria.

he's probably better than di maria, but question is how he would integrate and how long it would take him to contribute. di maria speaks the language and does not seem like a troublemaker while u hear quite different things about hazard.

hazard will prolly go to EPL anyhow..

Real lost that because of Kaka and not Di Maria

Who else qualifies to replace this ugly flop then in your opinion?

BAYERN_MUNICH wrote:Real lost that because of Kaka and not Di Maria

In your mind, maybe.

Toffer Harley wrote:he's probably better than di maria, but question is how he would integrate and how long it would take him to contribute. di maria speaks the language and does not seem like a troublemaker while u hear quite different things about hazard.

hazard will prolly go to EPL anyhow..

Hazard is better than Di Maria in my opinion, that's down to decision making alone.

Hazard a trouble maker? never heard about anything like that

huntsman wrote:

BAYERN_MUNICH wrote:Real lost that because of Kaka and not Di Maria

In your mind, maybe.

With the transfermoney of Kaka you could have bought 3 Hazards, now you have an expensive benchwarmer

BAYERN_MUNICH wrote:

huntsman wrote:

BAYERN_MUNICH wrote:Real lost that because of Kaka and not Di Maria

In your mind, maybe.

With the transfermoney of Kaka you could have bought 3 Hazards, now you have an expensive benchwarmer

Let's not discuss the expenses since neither me nor you are paying for the players' fees. Let's keep this business to accounts.

Di Maria is staying. I can't wait to see more batsh*t crazy threads next season.

di maria is better than hazard , just tends to be a bit unproductive at times with his decision making ..

troublemaker in the se

Mr Nick09 wrote:

Toffer Harley wrote:he's probably better than di maria, but question is how he would integrate and how long it would take him to contribute. di maria speaks the language and does not seem like a troublemaker while u hear quite different things about hazard.

hazard will prolly go to EPL anyhow..

Hazard is better than Di Maria in my opinion, that's down to decision making alone.

Hazard a trouble maker? never heard about anything like that

just in the sense that he is not very disciplined and doesn't like to train etc.

Van Buyten: Hazard has asked me about Bayern Munich

Daniel van Buyten says he has discussed with Lille star Eden Hazard the possibility of the 21-year-old signing for Bayern Munich.

"He is a young player with a large large margin for improvement," Van Buyten told RMC. "I have talked to him about Bayern, and that is why he is coming."

Hazard has made no secret that he plans to leave the Ligue 1 champions at the end of the season, with the Belgian starlet keen on a move to the Premier League, according to teammate Rio Mavuba.

But it is believed Hazard is being courted by clubs from other European countries as well.

"He is an attractive player for many clubs. We discussed a transfer to Bayern a little bit and he asked me some questions," Van Buyten told the news outlet. "But I think he has plenty of options."

It has been reported that Lille has set an asking price of 40 million euros for Hazard, who has a contract with the French club until 2015.

Bayern 2013: Gomez, Guidetti, Muller, Robben, Ribery, Shaqiri and Hazard.

Fear us...

Toffer Harley wrote:troublemaker in the se

Mr Nick09 wrote:

Toffer Harley wrote:he's probably better than di maria, but question is how he would integrate and how long it would take him to contribute. di maria speaks the language and does not seem like a troublemaker while u hear quite different things about hazard.

hazard will prolly go to EPL anyhow..

Hazard is better than Di Maria in my opinion, that's down to decision making alone.

Hazard a trouble maker? never heard about anything like that

just in the sense that he is not very disciplined and doesn't like to train etc.

again, who said he is not disciplined and doesnt like to train?

Idrisozet wrote:
Bayern 2013: Gomez, Guidetti, Muller, Robben, Ribery, Shaqiri and Hazard.

Fear us...

If you cant beat them, join them.

huntsman wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:
Bayern 2013: Gomez, Guidetti, Muller, Robben, Ribery, Shaqiri and Hazard.

Fear us...

If you cant beat them, join them.

Nice talk, but Bayern are going to look much better next season even if Hazard doesn't join.

We're still signing a world-class attacker and a youngstar with similar potential with Hazard...

Plus a new midfielder, Goalkeeper and Howedes.

Idrisozet wrote:We're still signing a world-class attacker and a youngstar with similar potential with Hazard...

Plus a new midfielder, Goalkeeper and Howedes.

Höwedes said in an interview two months ago (that is one month after the Goal.com article that claimed there might be an interest) that he wasn't interested in a move to Bayern. His contract lasts till June 2014, and as Schalke plays in the CL next season, there is not much incentive for Höwedes to transfer, especially if he'd expect a bench job at Bayern

http://www.sport1.de/de/fussball/fussball_bundesliga/newspage_521799.html

rwo power wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:We're still signing a world-class attacker and a youngstar with similar potential with Hazard...

Plus a new midfielder, Goalkeeper and Howedes.

Höwedes said in an interview two months ago (that is one month after the Goal.com article that claimed there might be an interest) that he wasn't interested in a move to Bayern. His contract lasts till June 2014, and as Schalke plays in the CL next season, there is not much incentive for Höwedes to transfer, especially if he'd expect a bench job at Bayern

http://www.sport1.de/de/fussball/fussball_bundesliga/newspage_521799.html

Well it was reported 2 days ago that Bayern are still after Howedes, Schalke refused a bid from us, but I agree it is highly unlikely to sign their captains two time in a role.

We've to look for someone else.

Idrisozet wrote:Well it was reported 2 days ago that Bayern are still after Howedes, Schalke refused a bid from us, but I agree it is highly unlikely to sign their captains two time in a role.

We've to look for someone else.

The Goal.com report from two days ago only referred to their own article of January and didn't take into account the later statements by Höwedes himself from February.

Bayern signed Dante right? what do you need Howedes for?

rwo power wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:Well it was reported 2 days ago that Bayern are still after Howedes, Schalke refused a bid from us, but I agree it is highly unlikely to sign their captains two time in a role.

We've to look for someone else.

The Goal.com report from two days ago only referred to their own article of January and didn't take into account the later statements by Höwedes himself from February.

How did you know this, if I may ask..?

Mr Nick09 wrote:Bayern signed Dante right? what do you need Howedes for?

Van Buyten is 34

lmao real madrid lost CDR becouse of di maria? you do know he was injured at that time?

Idrisozet wrote:

Mr Nick09 wrote:Bayern signed Dante right? what do you need Howedes for?

Van Buyten is 34

So? you have 3 CBs in Badstuber, Dante and Boateng, what do you need another highly talented CB like Howedes for?

Idrisozet wrote:

rwo power wrote:The Goal.com report from two days ago only referred to their own article of January and didn't take into account the later statements by Höwedes himself from February.

How did you know this, if I may ask..?

Because of this: "However, as Goal.com exclusively revealed in January, Schalke had agreed to listen to offers for Howedes after this summer's European Championship." That is their only hint that there might be something pointing to a transfer possibility. The rest is pure conjecture.

http://www.goal.com/en/news/15/germany/2012/04/27/3064328/bayern-still-keen-on-signing-howedes-but-schalke-vow-to