Re: Modric doesnt want to be torres version 2

by Kick Sat Jun 18, 2011 3:27 pm

If we were to play a 4-4-1 I'd rather see this:

-----------defence
Ramires-Mikel-Modric
--------------------Lampard
----------Drogba
--------Torres

by iNFINITY9910 Sat Jun 18, 2011 4:27 pm

kick mars wrote:We won't spend 100m when we can only report a 45m loss.

We wont be keeping all the players Smile

by Kick Sat Jun 18, 2011 4:28 pm

if we do spend 100m we would have to make 65m from our current players, I doubt it.

by Blue Sat Jun 18, 2011 4:51 pm

4-4-1-1?

NOOOOOOOOOOOO

I still believe we need an attacking midfielder.

If we sign Modric, it is possible to see both Essien and Ramires on the bench.

by Blue Sat Jun 18, 2011 4:51 pm

kick mars wrote:if we do spend 100m we would have to make 65m from our current players, I doubt it.

How did you come with this number?

by Kick Sat Jun 18, 2011 4:55 pm

Assuming the club breaks even over the year, FFP states we must make a max loss of 45m no? therefore for us to spend 100m and still fit into FFP's regulations we must make 65m from our current players.

by Blue Sat Jun 18, 2011 5:01 pm

kick mars wrote:Assuming the club breaks even over the year, FFP states we must make a max loss of 45m no? therefore for us to spend 100m and still fit into FFP's regulations we must make 65m from our current players.

I don't think it's this year where your loss have to be less then 45m, and i already that FFP will not be perfect and it will have major loopholes.

We will sing beyond Modric, De Bruyne, and Lukaku.

by Kick Sat Jun 18, 2011 5:04 pm

TBH, we only need one more. a LW/AM.

If that, everyone on this forum doubts Malouda but if we can get back to form, he can too.

by Blue Sat Jun 18, 2011 5:33 pm

Hopefully that player is Pastore.

Latest on Pastore:

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11668_6995463,00.html

We should've signed him in 2009, when we were strongly linked with him.

by Kick Sat Jun 18, 2011 5:37 pm

Depends on the cost, bet you thought you'd never hear a Chelsea fan say that.

by iNFINITY9910 Sat Jun 18, 2011 6:03 pm

I thought 65m was the allowance?

by Blue Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:22 pm

Skysports, telegraph, and guardian are all speculating that we will spend big this summer.

We will easily spend over 65m.

by iNFINITY9910 Sat Jun 18, 2011 8:12 pm

I mean 65m was the allowance.. we spend 100m and sell 35m?

by Blue Sat Jun 18, 2011 11:10 pm

iNFINITY9910 wrote:I mean 65m was the allowance.. we spend 100m and sell 35m?

I don't know anything about an allowance, i just know we will spend.

by fatman123 Sat Jun 18, 2011 11:30 pm

no! pastore maybe be in his early 20's but hes got the physical build of a 10 yr old, not big enough for the pl imo

by Blue Sun Jun 19, 2011 12:22 am

fatman123 wrote:no! pastore maybe be in his early 20's but hes got the physical build of a 10 yr old, not big enough for the pl imo

Pastore is amazingly build for his age, he is not smallish by any mean of imagination. Btw he is taller then any of our MF's.

by Kick Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:30 am

he's a better build for the epl than modric.

by Blue Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:35 am

How much do you think Modric is gonna cost?

by Kick Sun Jun 19, 2011 4:00 am

I'm hoping 33-35 m max, anymore than that and Pastore is the better option.

by Blue Sun Jun 19, 2011 4:08 am

I think signing Modric is going to be as Torres, even tougher imo.

If Spurs sell Modric, then this could cause a domino effect and they could further lose Bale and VDV. So i believe that Spurs would do everything in their power to hang on to Modric, and the only possible way they would let him go is massive bid somewhere between 40-45m.

hopefully we avoid spurs bait.

by Kick Sun Jun 19, 2011 6:26 am

VDV doesn't suit Spurs IMO, he's too good for them. Same with Modric, He'd suit us great, VDV should go to someone like Milan, where he will be their best AM.

Bale just sucks so he should stay at spurs. :coffee:

by iNFINITY9910 Sun Jun 19, 2011 10:20 am

Anyone noticed how we are linked with not buffed up players anymore? Even Torres is not that type of a player.

by Brigate Rossonere Sun Jun 19, 2011 1:47 pm

Modric doesnt want to be torres version 2 - Page 2 Funny-Nando-fernando-torres-18528780-600-417

Modric will never be anything like that (wo)man.

by iNFINITY9910 Sun Jun 19, 2011 2:33 pm

He came to Chelsea and has become a man Wink

Modric doesnt want to be torres version 2 - Page 2 Fernando%2BTorres_Chelsea%2BJersey

by Blue Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:33 pm

I really believe that Modric to Chelsea won't happen. This would be too damaging to spurs.

I think in the end Spurs will give Modric a massive wage raise and sign a few good players to show that they will compete with united, chelsea, arsenal, and Man city.

by iNFINITY9910 Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:39 pm

They will sign strikers as usual... lol

by Sponsored content