José Mourinho Sacked

futbol_bill wrote:OK I guess we are finally seeing eye to eye. I believe it is because the so obvious failures at Madrid and Chelsea have taken the blinders off of people like Perez and Abramovich. As I said ... unless he can find another sucker!!! ... look out Portugal NT!!! (and not only because of Mou .... NT teams need a four year cycle!!!)

I bet he wins another title at his next club. god you gotta hate mourinho

Should be a very interesting year regarding manager movements.

Imagine Rodgers takes over at Chelsea

Don't call me James wrote:Should be a very interesting year regarding manager movements.

Imagine Rodgers takes over at Chelsea

as it stands now he would be a better choice

Unique wrote:

futbol_bill wrote:?? from whose perspective. From the club, better to rid of the loser and hopefully the replacement (again Carlo) can clean up the mess. From his perspective, he can only hope he can find another sucker!!!

what I mean is if other clubs and managers sussed him out after 2 seasons. then you would think they would have him sussed when he moved to a different club. its not like he does anything different at a new club. I'm thinking once he has been worked out. changing clubs should not make a difference. its not like his game plan can catch people by surprised now.

Yes, but he can form a successful unit in his first years usually. This is something that he can do as a coach, where he's good at.
Usually in his second year he wins stuff as his team has become a unit which can play successful, preferably in a reactionary way with some underdog spirit.
If more is asked from him, like play more attractive football at Real, or now at Chelsea play worthy of champions, it turns out the emperor has no clothes.

So we stick with Rodgers so that Klopp can go to Chelsea?

It looks like when Milan called back Sacchi in 96 97 and Capello in 97 98 , and the second from beginning of the season. They were the 2 worst Milan seen from me (yes, worse than last year for me. Because you could expect it under the rookie Inzaghi ) .
The returns basically never work in football ( as we call dispargingly in Italy, the " minestra riscaldata " -- reheated soup,..) I believe it's the case even for Mourinho despite he won a league last year but overally it wasn't the impact expected and he is going to be even sacked ... you never could imagine it. I knock on wood because we had a return on bench too . Anyway I thought never to say this , but probably I don't wish a Mourinho s' return anymore. I'd hate if he ruins his legendary status left under us and expecially I'd hate if he'd be insulted like a Walter Mazzarri

Justice for Mazzarri.

nice to see that idiot mou still using, throw your player under the bus when things goes wrong tactics, been doing it for years were under the whole "mou type player" nonsense, wonder how many cats in that dressing room .

Where would he go next? PSG?

Unique wrote:

futbol_bill wrote:OK I guess we are finally seeing eye to eye. I believe it is because the so obvious failures at Madrid and Chelsea have taken the blinders off of people like Perez and Abramovich. As I said ... unless he can find another sucker!!! ... look out Portugal NT!!! (and not only because of Mou .... NT teams need a four year cycle!!!)

I bet he wins another title at his next club. god you gotta hate mourinho

Ok you've got me. Must have read my intro. I was anti Mourinho before he came to Madrid, even before he started running his mouth to Perez that he was the solution to all our problems. i was one of the socio leaders in the get rid of Mourinho. May he end up as the field doctor under some female coach!!!!

vanDEEZ wrote:Where would he go next? PSG?

If PSG don't fancy him he pretty much has to take a step down and go manage something like Manchester United.

Art Morte wrote:

vanDEEZ wrote:Where would he go next? PSG?

If PSG don't fancy him he pretty much has to take a step down and go manage something like Manchester United.

Brave choice trash talking the biggest club in England when your own hasn only done 1 thing of note in 25 years.

I believe it's called 'banter'. I've heard someone use the word here before, maybe they'll explain.

Art Morte wrote:I believe it's called 'banter'. I've heard someone use the word here before, maybe they'll explain.

I was also bantering, maybe the guys can get you to understand that it's a two-way street

'bantering' - I like that word

Kick wrote:

Club believes in manager and squad
The club wants to make it clear that Jose continues to have our full support.

As Jose has said himself, results have not been good enough and the team's performances must improve. However, we believe that we have the right manager to turn this season around and that he has the squad with which to do it.

http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2015/10/club-believes-in-manager-and-squad.html?extcmp=SOCIA_FB_ENG_NEWS_STATEMENT

Big statement from the club, here. Looks like he has til the end of the season.

Time to lock the thread, I think

Or it could be the dreaded vote of the confidence

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:Or it could be the dreaded vote of the confidence

To be honest, I think it's just stating what I've known all along, we're seeing this out with Jose.

Because not only we (the club) want him here long term, but he wants to be here long term.

I agree tbh, although i don't think the statement means much at all tbh. Clubs lie all the time, especially ones with owners who have been known to be very trigger happy.

Yeah, statements like that don't matter anything. Clubs have to say stuff like that in public up until the point the manager gets canned. Also, Chelsea = Abramovich and I kinda doubt those are his words.

Mind you, I don't think Mou will be sacked before Christmas at least.

Statements like that are not conclusive, but are important, and they do mean a lot of things in most cases. In the end, it is in the interest of the club to make a statement supporting their manager against the Media and rumor sweeps at least for the internal stability of the team.

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:. Clubs lie all the time, especially ones with owners who have been known to be very trigger happy.

Clubs are institutions, not kindergartens teaching kids right from wrong. So of course they will say what they deem is to the best interest of the institution at the right moment even if it meant that their stance will change in a week's time or a month's.

looks like gil is not a happy camper

Well, it's better for all the rest of us to have him, club and fans want to have around! That way the rest of us can enjoy Mou's continuous demise. cAn't wait to hear his rants. i wonder how long before he starts blaming everything on players (in addition to media, refs and football association).

http://www.goal.com/en/news/1717/editorial/2015/10/05/16044082/chelsea-bow-to-mourinho-plea-but-statement-is-clear-improve?ICID=HP_HN_1

lol, and someone suggested this thread could be closed!!!

he did the same thing at Madrid. It was enough for him to hang on until summer!

He's been charged with misconduct by the FA following his rant, btw. I'm digging it how the FA are rubbing it in.